Skip to content

Mascouche, QC · Charitable organization

Groupe ressources des moulins

Recevoir trier et tenir un compoir de vëtement usagé et objet utilitaire pour la maison pour la famille et personne a faible revenu.

C$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESEAU DES PROCHES AIDANTS DES MOULINSC$6,000
NOURRI-SOURCE LANAUDIEREC$4,000
COMITÉ D'AIDE AUX LACHENOISC$3,500
LA HUTTE HEBERGEMENT D'URGENCE TERREBONNEC$3,500
CARREFOUR FAMILIAL DES MOULINSC$3,500
LE RELAIS MASCOUCHEC$3,500
CALACS LA CHRYSALIDEC$3,500
PARENFANT MASCOUCHEC$3,500
LA ROSE BLEUC$3,500
HABITAT JEUNESSE MASCOUCHEC$3,500
CENTRE LE DIAPASONC$3,500
ASSOCIATION PANDA MRC LES MOULINSC$3,500
REGROUP'ELLES TERREBONNEC$3,500
ASSOCIATION O.L. DES MOULINSC$3,500
LA BARAKMASCOUCHEC$3,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$402k · 21 repeat orgsC$137k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +54% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
43

Total granted

C$402k
C$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+54%

Still filing today

90%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HJ
    HABITAT JEUNESSE MASCOUCHE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$28k · revenue +144%
  • LB
    LA BARAK MASCOUCHE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$27k · revenue +64%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION O.L.O DES MOULINS
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$26k · revenue +64% · 73% of their budget

Funded once

  • LR
    LE RELAIS DE MASCOUCHE
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k
  • OT
    O.L.O TERREBONNE
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maison Véro & Louis (Varennes)

Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes

—
2
Espace M - Ressources pour mères monoparentales

Venir en aide aux jeunes femmes monoparentales en leur offrant la formation le soutien l'accompagnement et le logement afin de faciliter leur insertion sociale.

—
3
Lieu de Rencontres Parents et Enfants 'la Maison Buissionnière'.

Aide à la petite enfance

—
4
Centre de la Petite Enfance Les Poussineaux

Garderie pour enfants sans but lucratif

—
5
La Maison Séjour

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentés ou en difficulté temporaire avec ou sans enfant

—
6
'La Chrysalide' Centre d'accompagnement aux familles monoparentales

L'organisme vient en aide aux familles monoparentales en leur offrant des logements à prix modique. il offre également des activités cliniques permettant aux parents et aus enfants de se rapprocher et de développer leurs aptitutdes.

—
7
Tangage Des Laurentides
—
8
Centre d'entraide d'Argenteuil
—
9
Centre-Femmes 'La Jardilec' Inc

Venir en aide aux femmes souffrant d'isolement psycho social

—
10
La dauphinelle

L'organisme offre un service de dépannage d'urgence à toutes femmes et enfants en situation de danger pour leur santé physique ou mentale

—
11
Maison d'hébergement d'Anjou

Accueil et hébergement pour femmes en difficultés avec ou sans enfants. programme d'intervention visant l'autonomie féminine . programme de sensibilisation à l'externe.

—
12
Centre De La Petite Enfance La Peluche
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre de Ressources pour Hommes du Sud de Lanaudière and the most unlike its peers is La fabrique de la paroisse de Notre-Dame-du-Saint-Rosaire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT JEUNESSE MASCOUCHE — C$27,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetLA BARAK MASCOUCHE — C$27,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetASSOCIATION O.L.O DES MOULINS — C$25,500 over 7y, 73% of budgetPARENFANTS MASCOUCHE — C$24,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetPHARE ENFANTS ET FAMILLE — C$24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCALACS LACHYSALIDE — C$24,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRE HÉBERGEMENT DIAPASON — C$23,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetRESEAU DES PROCHES AIDANTS DES MOULINS — C$23,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetLA ROSE BLEU — C$21,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCARREFOUR FAMILIAL DES MOULINS — C$19,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetASSOCIATION PANDA MRC LES MOULINS — C$19,500 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetDYSPHASIE LANAUDIERE — C$19,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetNOURRI SOURCE LANAUDIÈRE — C$18,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetTRISOMIQUE-21 LANAUDIERE — C$17,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetEGLISE SAINT-ROSAIRE — C$14,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetLE RELAIS MASCOUCHE — C$13,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetREGROUP'ELLES TERREBONNE — C$13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLA HUTTE HÉBERGEMENT D'URGENCE TERREBONNE — C$10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMITÉ D'AIDE AUX LACHENOIS — C$8,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPrevention Suicide Lanaudiere — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRE DE RESSOURCE POUR HOMME DU SUD LANAUDIERE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT JEUNESSE MASCOUCHE ↗
  • Who funds LA BARAK MASCOUCHE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION O.L.O DES MOULINS ↗
  • Who funds PARENFANTS MASCOUCHE ↗
  • Who funds PHARE ENFANTS ET FAMILLE ↗
  • Who funds CALACS LACHYSALIDE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE HÉBERGEMENT DIAPASON ↗
  • Who funds RESEAU DES PROCHES AIDANTS DES MOULINS ↗
  • Who funds LA ROSE BLEU ↗
  • Who funds CARREFOUR FAMILIAL DES MOULINS ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION PANDA MRC LES MOULINS ↗
  • Who funds DYSPHASIE LANAUDIERE ↗
  • Who funds NOURRI SOURCE LANAUDIÈRE ↗
  • Who funds TRISOMIQUE-21 LANAUDIERE ↗
  • Who funds EGLISE SAINT-ROSAIRE ↗
  • Who funds LE RELAIS MASCOUCHE ↗
  • Who funds REGROUP'ELLES TERREBONNE ↗
  • Who funds LA HUTTE HÉBERGEMENT D'URGENCE TERREBONNE ↗
  • Who funds COMITÉ D'AIDE AUX LACHENOIS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Philanthropie LanaudièreQC10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Philanthropie Lanaudière · Fondation St-Hubert · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 140939463:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Groupe ressources des moulins’ filings →