Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Victoriaville, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Croteau Isabelle Caron

L'activité principale de l'organisme est de recueillir des fonds dans le but d'effectuer des dons à d'autres organismes de bienfaisance enregistrés dont l'objectif est de promouvoir l'amélioration de la qualité santé de la population en général

C$160k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
—
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION HÔTEL-DIEU D'ARTHABASKA (FONDATION À NOTRE SANTÉ DC$100,000
FONDATION DE L'ERMITAGEC$60,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$361k · 7 repeat orgsC$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

C$361k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+38%

Still filing today

86%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FONDATION HÔTEL-DIEU D'ARTHABASKA (FONDATION À NOTRE SANTÉ D
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$184k · revenue +27%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'ERMITAGE
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$146k · revenue +47%
  • FL
    FONDATION LES AMIS D'ÉLLIOT
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$24k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAISON DE THÉRAPIE VICTORIAVILLE-ARTHABASKAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +103%
  • P1
    PARTENAIRES 12-18 ARTHABASKA
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -20%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU COLLEGE DE VICTORIAVILLEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +482%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maison Véro & Louis (Varennes)

Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes

—
2
Logis Du Bel Age

Hébergement pour personnes âgées autonomes et semi-autonomes

—
3
Maison Des Aines De Grande-Vallee

Logement et soins des personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie.

—
4
Maison Marie-Rollet

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentées et en difficulté accompagnées ou non de leurs enfants.

—
5
Fondation de l'hôpital d'Argenteuil

Recevoir des dons ou legs pour les fins particulières du cmsss d'argenteuil dans le but d'aider d'établissement dans la réalisation de sa mission - organiser des campagnes de souscription et solliciter des dons en faveur du cmsss…

—
6
Maison de la famille Avignon

Accueil écoute accompagnement références causeries répit activités parent-enfants ateliers pré et postnataux centre de documentation.

—
7
Fondation Émilie-Gamelin

Système d'épicerie et livraison à domicile

—
8
Demeure Toi

Site web pour recueillir des dons pour l'organisme

—
9
La Maison Séjour

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentés ou en difficulté temporaire avec ou sans enfant

—
10
La Maison soutien aux Aidants

Aider les aidants naturels et offrir des services de surveillance sécuritaire et de répit auprès des personnes dans le besoin.

—
11
Centre France Mailhiot

D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches

—
12
La Maison Arc-En-Ciel

Aide aux jeunes toxicomanes

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'ermitage Inc. and the most unlike its peers is La Securite Alimentaire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION HÔTEL-DIEU D'ARTHABASKA (FONDATION À NOTRE SANTÉ D — C$183,665 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ERMITAGE — C$145,575 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetFONDATION LES AMIS D'ÉLLIOT — C$24,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetMAISON DE FIN DE VIE MARIE PAGÉ — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAISON DE THÉRAPIE VICTORIAVILLE-ARTHABASKA — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTENAIRES 12-18 ARTHABASKA — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFONDATION DU COLLEGE DE VICTORIAVILLE — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE L'ARTHRITE — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE LA MAISON DES GREFFÉS LINA CYR — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSÉCURITÉ ALIMENTAIRE — C$450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA COOPÉRATIVE DES TRAVAILLEUSE ET TRAVAILLEURS DE THÉÂTRE D — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION DES FAMILLES MONOPARENTALES OU RECOMPOSÉES LA SO — C$120 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Jacques & M…Fondation Famille Fra…Centraide Québec Cha…Conam Charitable Foun…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation Jacques & Michel AugerQC13.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Jacques & Michel Auger · Fondation Famille François et Monique Bourgeo · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Conam Charitable Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 844833111:2022-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Croteau Isabelle Caron’s filings →