Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

L'Institution Kupat Torah Vechesed

Help with providing food to large families in need provide interest free loans for individuals in difficult situations financial assistance for large families in need incentive rewards to individuals to continue nightly religious studies

C$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$48k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$48k
C$5,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIFALEI CHAIM BCHESEDC$48,000
IMRAY CHAIM DCHASIDAI WIZNITZC$8,547
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LACHOLEHC$5,500
MAZEL CHARITY FUNDC$2,415
CANADIAN FREIDNS OF YAD LACHIM ORGANIZATIONC$1,333
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$495k · 6 repeat orgsC$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

C$495k
C$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CF OF MISHON
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$98k · revenue +134%
  • CI
    CONGREGATION IMRAY CHAIM
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$74k · revenue +18%
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF
    4× · 2017–2021 · C$4k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • M
    MEOROTH
    one grant, 2017 · C$23k
  • WC
    WIZNITZ COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · C$18k
  • C
    CHABAD
    one grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue -85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
3
Kolel Yeshivat Kehilat Jacob

To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york

—
4
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
5
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
6
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—
7
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
8
Canadian Friends of Toldos Aharon

To provide scholarship and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses at yeshiva toldos aharon for the furtherance of religious study

—
9
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
10
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
11
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
12
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Kehal Toldos Yakov Yosef and the most unlike its peers is Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BEHESSED — C$313,100 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCF OF MISHON — C$97,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCONGREGATION IMRAY CHAIM — C$73,547 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCHABAD — C$10,011 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCF OF SATMAR — C$5,695 over 1y, 11% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$3,873 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$3,667 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM — C$3,280 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS TORAS MOSHE — C$2,969 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ESTHER — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$1,650 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANADIAN FREIDNS OF YAD LACHIM ORGANIZATION — C$1,333 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMENUCHA V'SIMCHA — C$1,228 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION SEPHARADE BETH HILLEL TIFERET DAVID — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHABAD MILES END — C$870 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE — C$600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION GATE DAVID OF BOBOV — C$531 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTZAMACH tZADIK — C$450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASIM TOVIM FOUNDATION — C$192 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundD E Foundation / la F…Fondation de la Famil…Menucha VesimchaRosenberg Family Foun…The M.K. Foundation/L…Zichron David and Pes…The Micha Life Founda…The F&R Hauer Charita…
Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB)QC21.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 860303635:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on L'Institution Kupat Torah Vechesed’s filings →