East St Paul, MB · Private foundation
The Homenko Fund Inc.
Donations to qualified donees.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UKRAINIAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTRE | C$13,500 |
| UKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION OF TARAS SEVCHENKO5× · 2017–2024 · C$33k · revenue +28%
- RURUSALKA UKRAINIAN DANCE ENSEMBLE2× · 2017–2018 · C$7k · revenue +93%
- SAST.VLADIMIR AND OLGA CATHEDRAL2× · 2020–2021 · C$4k · revenue +130%
Funded once
- TUTroyanda Ukrainian Dance Ensemble Inc.one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +27%
- OUOrlan Ukrainian Folk Ensemble Inc.one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -40%
- RMRural Municipality of Sutartburnone grant, 2018 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people
Producing recordings to record and archive music of classical composers and use these materials to advance education in operatic and other classical music. Production of operatic performances. Compilation of a history of our association.…
Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards
The niagara ukrainian fund supports artistic cultural and educational activities and scholarships for ukrainian-canadians in niagara and provides economic support and settlement services for ukrainian newcomers to niagara
Education and engagement to foster understanding and appreciation of visual arts by staging exhibits holding lectures art classes and preparing materials for publication
Umsa continues to advance the education and exposure of ukrainian music artists and composers through performance publication and informative events to benefit the multicultural fabric of canadian society such as two annual concerts. also…
Promotion of ukrainian culture and operation of arts amphitheatre; support for ukrainian refugees moving to canada permanently
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukraninian Canadian Congress Charitable and Educational Trust and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Omega Women's Alumnae Trust Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION OF TARAS SEVCHENKO ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTRE ↗
- Who funds RUSALKA UKRAINIAN DANCE ENSEMBLE ↗
- Who funds LUBOV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST.VLADIMIR AND OLGA CATHEDRAL ↗
- Who funds Plast Ukrainian Youth Association of Canada ↗
- Who funds Troyanda Ukrainian Dance Ensemble Inc. ↗
- Who funds Orlan Ukrainian Folk Ensemble Inc. ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN RESEARCH & DOCIMENTATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST ↗
- Who funds PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF MANITOBA ↗
- Who funds ALPHA OMEGA WOMEN'S ALUMNAE ↗
- Who funds O. Koshetz Choir ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC ACHPARCHY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc. · Wasyl Topolnicky Memorial Foundation Inc. · The Winnipeg Foundation · Bcu Foundation · Zorianna and Eugene Hyworon Foundation Inc. · The Huculak Foundation · Ihnatowycz Family Foundation · All Charities Campaign · Canada Gives · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.