Skip to content

North York, ON · Private foundation

The Huculak Foundation

Receiving bequests and donating to other charitable organizations

C$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$40k
  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$95k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$10,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IVAN FRANKO HOMESC$50,000
UKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATIONC$35,000
CANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATIONC$15,000
SHEVCHENKO FOUNDATIONC$15,000
UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF QUEBECC$10,000
PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIOC$10,000
HUMANITE FOUNDATION CANADAC$10,000
WORLD FEDERATION OF UKRAINIAN WOMEN'S ORGANIZATIONSC$7,500
UCRAINICA RESEARCH INSTITUTEC$7,500
UKRAINIAN CANADIAN RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION CENTERC$7,500
FRIENDS OF THE UKRAINIAN FOLKLORE CENTERC$7,500
CHAMBER FACTORYC$5,000
TORONTO UKRAINIAN FOUNDATIONC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 17 repeat orgsC$98k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+62%

Still filing today

94%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IVAN FRANKO HOME
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$350k · revenue +71%
  • UW
    UKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$155k · revenue +732%
  • PU
    PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$143k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HU
    HELP US HELP THE CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$15k · revenue +62%
  • PU
    PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA
    one grant, 2019 · C$10k
  • SN
    ST NICHOLAS CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · C$10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Foundation for Ukrainian Studies

Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards

—
2
Canada's National Ukrainian Festival Inc.

Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people

—
3
Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Foundation Inc
—
4
Ukrainian Canadian Art Foundation

Education and engagement to foster understanding and appreciation of visual arts by staging exhibits holding lectures art classes and preparing materials for publication

—
5
Niagara Ukrainian Fund

The niagara ukrainian fund supports artistic cultural and educational activities and scholarships for ukrainian-canadians in niagara and provides economic support and settlement services for ukrainian newcomers to niagara

—
6
Chair of Ukrainian Studies Foundation / La Fondation de la Chaire des Etudes Ukrainiennes

Provide scholarships to students for post secondary education and operate the canada ukraine parliamentary program

—
7
Desna Foundation

Conducted research into the cultural contributions made by canadians by ukrainian descent; promote education and community involvement; promote publication of books periodicals and newspapers enabling canadians to better understand the…

—
8
Wolodymyr George Danyliw Foundation

Funding for research seminars on contemporary ukraine

—
9
The Petro Jacyk Education Foundation

Promoted education in a wide variety of ukrainian studies by providing funds for scholarships and stipends to posts graduate students at educational institutions in canada and abroad to further studies in ukrainian heritage and history.

—
10
Ukrainian Museum of Canada of the Ukrainian Women's Association of Canada

The charity operates and maintains a museum of ukrainian cultural artifacts historical books and clothing.

—
11
Canadian Ukrainian Opera Association

Producing recordings to record and archive music of classical composers and use these materials to advance education in operatic and other classical music. Production of operatic performances. Compilation of a history of our association.…

—
12
Pokrova Ukrainian Arts Network
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukraninian Canadian Congress Charitable and Educational Trust and the most unlike its peers is Punctuate! Theatre Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIVAN FRANKO HOME — C$350,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetUKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION — C$155,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetPLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA — C$142,500 over 7y, 23% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION OF TARAS SHEVHENKO — C$72,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — C$67,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION CENTRE — C$67,500 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetTORONTO UKRAINIAN CHARITABLE TRUST — C$42,000 over 5y, 60% of budgetUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — C$30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS — C$25,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHUMANITE FOUNDATION CANADA — C$20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSICK KIDS FOUNDATION — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST. JOSEPHS HEALTH CENTRE — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARACHUTE CANADA — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHELP US HELP THE CHILDREN — C$15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetUKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF QUEBEC — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN WOMENS LEAGUE — C$10,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetCHAMBER FACTORY — C$10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UKRAINIAN FOLKLORE CENTER — C$7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUCRAINICA RESEARCH INSTITUTE — C$7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD FEDERATION OF UKRAINIAN WOMEN'S ORGANIZATIONS — C$7,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetST VLADIMIR INSTITUTE — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDOPOMOHA UKRAINI — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPUNCTUATE THEATRE — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNF FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Temerty FoundationON24.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Temerty Foundation · Ihnatowycz Family Foundation · Bcu Foundation · Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · Myhal Family Foundation · Zak Foundation · Canada-Ukraine Foundation · Franko Family Foundation · The Petro Jacyk Education Foundation · Plast Ukrainian Youth Association of Canada (1978) Local Gro · BenefAction Foundation · Toronto Ukrainian Library Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 851418731:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Huculak’s filings →