Skip to content
Canadian charities

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

Zorianna and Eugene Hyworon Foundation Inc.

The objective of thee foundation is to accumulate funds for distribution to other registered charities.

C$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$11k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$27k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$21k
C$5,600
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UKRAINIAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATION CENTREC$10,500
UKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION OF TARAS SHEVCHENKOC$10,000
HELP US HELPC$6,000
UKRANIAN CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONC$5,600
ASSINIBOINE PARK CONSERVANCYC$5,000
THE CANADA - UKRAINIAN FDNC$5,000
FRIENDS OF TH CDN MUSEUM FOR HUMAN RIGHTSC$5,000
PLAST UKRANIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF MANITOBAC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$229k · 11 repeat orgsC$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -39% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

C$229k
C$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-39%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    HELP US HELP
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$56k · revenue +242%
  • UC
    Ukranian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$48k · revenue +28%
  • UC
    UKRAINIAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATION CENTRE
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$21k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • HU
    HELP US HELP
    one grant, 2023 · C$6k
  • SA
    St.Mary's Academy Foundation Inc.
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Foundation for Ukrainian Studies

Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards

—
2
Canada's National Ukrainian Festival Inc.

Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people

—
3
Musee Ukraina Museum Inc.

The mandate of the museum is to preserves the history of the ukrainian people within a multicultural society. through exhibits educational programs and interactive activties the museum brings to life the story of a significant group of…

—
4
Ukrainian Canadian Art Foundation

Education and engagement to foster understanding and appreciation of visual arts by staging exhibits holding lectures art classes and preparing materials for publication

—
5
Chair of Ukrainian Studies Foundation / La Fondation de la Chaire des Etudes Ukrainiennes

Provide scholarships to students for post secondary education and operate the canada ukraine parliamentary program

—
6
Ukrainian Museum of Canada of the Ukrainian Women's Association of Canada

The charity operates and maintains a museum of ukrainian cultural artifacts historical books and clothing.

—
7
Niagara Ukrainian Fund

The niagara ukrainian fund supports artistic cultural and educational activities and scholarships for ukrainian-canadians in niagara and provides economic support and settlement services for ukrainian newcomers to niagara

—
8
Ukrainian Canadian Research & Documentation Centre

Undertake and support educational research projects and publications relating to Ukrainian and Ukrainian Canadian historical themes.

—
9
The Petro Jacyk Education Foundation

Promoted education in a wide variety of ukrainian studies by providing funds for scholarships and stipends to posts graduate students at educational institutions in canada and abroad to further studies in ukrainian heritage and history.

—
10
Ukrainian Folk Arts Centre & Museum Inc.

Promotion of ukrainian culture and operation of arts amphitheatre; support for ukrainian refugees moving to canada permanently

—
11
Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Foundation Inc
—
12
Desna Foundation

Conducted research into the cultural contributions made by canadians by ukrainian descent; promote education and community involvement; promote publication of books periodicals and newspapers enabling canadians to better understand the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oseredok Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Centre Inc. and the most unlike its peers is St. Mary's Academy Foundation Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHELP US HELP — C$55,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetUkranian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko — C$47,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLubov SSMI Foundation — C$30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetASSINIBOINE PARK CONSERVANCY — C$30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATION CENTRE — C$20,582 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetUKRANIAN CONRESS FDN — C$15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CDN MUSEUM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWINNIPEG ART GALLERY — C$9,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCNIB FOUNDATION MANITOBA — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUKRANIAN CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION — C$5,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSt.Mary's Academy Foundation Inc. — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetICOMOC CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRUSALKA — C$5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUKRAINIAN STUDIES SOCIETY — C$2,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetPLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ASSOCIATION OF MANITOBA — C$1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMB PARENTS FOR UKRAINIAN EDUCATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOOSLI — C$500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg Foundati…Ukrainian Canadian Fo…All Charities CampaignWasyl Topolnicky Memo…The Asper FoundationThe Ukrainian Catholi…Bcu FoundationTemerty FoundationThe Jewish Foundation…Thomas Sill Foundatio…Wcpd FoundationThe Homenko Fund Inc.
The Winnipeg FoundationMB11.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · All Charities Campaign · Wasyl Topolnicky Memorial Foundation Inc. · The Asper Foundation · The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc. · Bcu Foundation · Temerty Foundation · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · Wcpd Foundation · The Homenko Fund Inc.

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 835770058:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Zorianna and Eugene Hyworon’s filings →