Winnipeg, MB · Public foundation
The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc.
Funding ukrainian catholic dioceses, churches, schools, seminaries, organizations and other registered charitable organizations
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k9 grants · C$32k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$27k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$151k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC ARCHEPARCHY OF WINNPEG | C$150,755 |
| IMACULATE HEART MARY SCHOOL | C$16,553 |
| UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CULTURAL & EDUCATION CENTRE | C$10,000 |
| HOLY SPIRIT UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC SEMINARY | C$6,154 |
| STS. VLADIMIR & OLGA CATHEDRAL | C$6,000 |
| LUBOV SSMI FOUNDATION | C$5,000 |
| WELCOME HOME MISSION | C$3,459 |
| CANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATION | C$3,200 |
| UKRAINIAN YOUTH OCIATION | C$2,950 |
| PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ORGANIZATION | C$2,500 |
| ORLAN URAINIAN FOLK ENSEMBLE INC. | C$2,000 |
| KOSHEZ CHOIR | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -37% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IHIMACULATE HEART MARY SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · C$103k · revenue +35%
- UCUKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS8× · 2017–2024 · C$47k · revenue +9%
- SVSTS. VLADIMIR AND OLGA CATHEDRAL7× · 2017–2024 · C$47k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- CCNEWAone grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue -48%
- SNST NICHOLAS UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2021 · C$6k
- HFHOOSLI FOLK ENSEMBLE INCone grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people
Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards
Ukrainian catholic religious organization
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ukrainian Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Manitoba and the most unlike its peers is The Welcome Home - a Mission of St. Alphonsus Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC ARCHEPARCHY OF WINNPEG ↗
- Who funds IMACULATE HEART MARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS ↗
- Who funds STS. VLADIMIR AND OLGA CATHEDRAL ↗
- Who funds LUBOV SSMI FOUNDATION INC. ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CULTURAL EDUCATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds CANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CNEWA ↗
- Who funds PLAST ↗
- Who funds THE UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CULTURAL & EDUCATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CANADIAN RESEARCH AND DOCMENTATION CENTRE ↗
- Who funds ST NICHOLAS UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ↗
- Who funds KOSHETZ CHOIR ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOME MISSION ↗
- Who funds HOOSLI FOLK ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds ORLAN URAINIAN FOLK ENSEMBLE INC. ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN STUDIES SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · The Homenko Fund Inc. · Wasyl Topolnicky Memorial Foundation Inc. · The Catholic Foundation of Manitoba · Zorianna and Eugene Hyworon Foundation Inc. · Bcu Foundation · The Winnipeg Foundation · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · All Charities Campaign · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.