Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Public foundation

The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc.

Funding ukrainian catholic dioceses, churches, schools, seminaries, organizations and other registered charitable organizations

C$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$151k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k9 grants · C$32k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$27k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$151k
C$5,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC ARCHEPARCHY OF WINNPEGC$150,755
IMACULATE HEART MARY SCHOOLC$16,553
UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CULTURAL & EDUCATION CENTREC$10,000
HOLY SPIRIT UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC SEMINARYC$6,154
STS. VLADIMIR & OLGA CATHEDRALC$6,000
LUBOV SSMI FOUNDATIONC$5,000
WELCOME HOME MISSIONC$3,459
CANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATIONC$3,200
UKRAINIAN YOUTH OCIATIONC$2,950
PLAST UKRAINIAN YOUTH ORGANIZATIONC$2,500
ORLAN URAINIAN FOLK ENSEMBLE INC.C$2,000
KOSHEZ CHOIRC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.2M · 13 repeat orgsC$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -37% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

C$1.2M
C$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-37%

Still filing today

85%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    IMACULATE HEART MARY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$103k · revenue +35%
  • UC
    UKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$47k · revenue +9%
  • SV
    STS. VLADIMIR AND OLGA CATHEDRAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$47k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • C
    CNEWA
    one grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue -48%
  • SN
    ST NICHOLAS UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · C$6k
  • HF
    HOOSLI FOLK ENSEMBLE INC
    one grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue -39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canada's National Ukrainian Festival Inc.

Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people

—
2
The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc.
—
3
Sts Peter & Paul's Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
4
St. Joseph's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
5
All Saints Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
6
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of St Nicholas
—
7
Canadian Foundation for Ukrainian Studies

Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards

—
8
The Ukrainian Catholic Parish of St. Nicholas
—
9
Sts Peter & Paul Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
10
Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
11
Ukrainian Catholic Episcopal Corporation All Saints Ukrainia

Ukrainian catholic religious organization

—
12
Pokrova Ukrainian Arts Network
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ukrainian Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Manitoba and the most unlike its peers is The Welcome Home - a Mission of St. Alphonsus Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUKRAINIAN CATHOLIC ARCHEPARCHY OF WINNPEG — C$834,912 over 8y, 13% of budgetIMACULATE HEART MARY SCHOOL — C$103,391 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN CONGRESS — C$47,404 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetSTS. VLADIMIR AND OLGA CATHEDRAL — C$46,800 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetLUBOV SSMI FOUNDATION INC. — C$32,536 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUKRAINIAN CULTURAL EDUCATION CENTRE — C$32,242 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATION — C$28,532 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCNEWA — C$25,332 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLAST — C$25,102 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTHE UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CULTURAL & EDUCATION CENTRE — C$20,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN RESEARCH AND DOCMENTATION CENTRE — C$10,763 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetKOSHETZ CHOIR — C$5,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWELCOME HOME MISSION — C$3,459 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHOOSLI FOLK ENSEMBLE INC — C$2,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetORLAN URAINIAN FOLK ENSEMBLE INC. — C$2,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetUKRAINIAN STUDIES SOCIETY — C$1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras ShevchenkoMB12.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · The Homenko Fund Inc. · Wasyl Topolnicky Memorial Foundation Inc. · The Catholic Foundation of Manitoba · Zorianna and Eugene Hyworon Foundation Inc. · Bcu Foundation · The Winnipeg Foundation · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · All Charities Campaign · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under support of schools and education.

Source object 891194342:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada’s filings →