Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Semeurs De Charité/ Zoreah Tzedokos

Relief of poverty

C$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$51k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k16 grants · C$30k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$103k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$51k
C$2,610
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENUCHA V' SIMCHAC$51,475
KEHILAS BELZC$30,129
KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BELZC$26,860
CONGREGATION BELZC$18,948
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BELZC$15,030
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$12,207
BELZ AVREICHMIN COMMUNITY CENTERC$6,254
CONGREGATION ZIHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZC$6,063
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZALC$5,530
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$3,101
RAV CHESEDC$2,610
BNOT JERUSALEM GARDERIE ET ECOLEC$1,937
IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDEI WIZNITZ CONGREGATIONC$1,000
BNOT JERUSALEM SEMINARYC$613
REFUAH VCHESEDC$600
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$302k · 9 repeat orgsC$36k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

C$302k
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$16k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONG. BELZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$94k · revenue +8%
  • MV
    MENUCHA V' SIMCHA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$65k · revenue +36%
  • KO
    KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BELZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$43k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • K
    KMHB
    one grant, 2023 · C$11k · revenue -4%
  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -29%
  • CM
    CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEVgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
3
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
4
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
7
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
8
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
9
Kollel Derech Chaim
—
10
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
Bais Moshe Congregation

Funding for seminaries and other religious colleges.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Rav Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
12/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONG. BELZ — C$93,989 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMENUCHA V' SIMCHA — C$64,830 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BELZ — C$43,360 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKEHILAS BELZ — C$30,130 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY VMM — C$26,548 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BELZ — C$20,730 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKMHB — C$10,609 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$9,530 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELZ AVREICHMIN COMMUNITY CENTER — C$9,408 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCONGREGATION ZIHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZ — C$6,063 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAV CHESED — C$3,610 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$3,101 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBNOT JERUSALEM GARDERIE ET ECOLE — C$1,937 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC KOLLEL FDTN. — C$1,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDEI WIZNITZ CONGREGATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOT JERUSALEM SEMINARY — C$613 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH VCHESED — C$600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS IGUD WISNITZ — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEHILAS MOSODS TOSH — C$500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetKOLEL TORAH VYIRAH — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ CSL — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHEL TORAH — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundMifalei Chaim Bechese…Fondation de la Famil…Rosenberg Family Foun…Congrégation BelzThe Micha Life Founda…The M.K. Foundation/L…Menucha VesimchaKehilas Belz / Regrou…Jewish Community Foun…
Hatzolas Yisroel D'ArizalQC23.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Congrégation Belz · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Menucha Vesimcha · Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire Belz · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 759953474:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Semeurs De Charité/ Zoreah Tzedokos’ filings →