Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

Rav Chesed

Supporting charitable programs

C$42k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$42k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$41,891
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kehilas BelzC$41,891
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$477k · 4 repeat orgsC$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +167% since the first grant, against +158% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

C$477k
C$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+167%
+158%

Still filing today

75%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KB
    Kehilas Beiz
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$226k · revenue +423%
  • BC
    BELZ COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$12k · revenue +167%
  • CB
    Congregation Beiz
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$7k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS AHAVAS CHESED
    one grant, 2018 · C$6k
  • KT
    KOLLEL TIFERES YAKOV YITZCHOKgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +162%
  • MC
    MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
3
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
4
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
5
École communautaire Belz / Belz Community School

Operate a jewish school in which the bible the study of hebrew prayers and other subjects of the jewish religion will be taught more specifically the general and religious instruction in the strict context of the orthodox jewish religion.…

—
6
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Kollel Derech Chaim
—
9
Congregation Zichron Yakov Yitzchok Belz
—
10
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
11
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
12
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Chevrah Msamchei Lev. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHASDEI LEVY YITZCOK — C$231,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetKehilas Beiz — C$226,271 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY CENTER — C$12,249 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCongregation Beiz — C$7,085 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED — C$2,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZAL — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChevra Mesamche Lev — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAcademie Beth Esther — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeiz Avreichim Community Center — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKehilas Beiz — C$750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Menucha VesimchaCharité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Maharam Tav FundHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Rosenberg Family Foun…The M.K. Foundation/L…Jewish Community Foun…Communauté Détenteurs…Kehilas Belz / Regrou…Institut Kollel Noam …Congrégation Belz
Menucha VesimchaQC12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Menucha Vesimcha · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Communauté Détenteurs Religieux Belza / CDRB / Kehal Machzikei Hadas Belz / KMHB · Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire Belz · Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer · Congrégation Belz

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 801926478:2020-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rav Chesed’s filings →