Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Outremont, QC · Private foundation

Michael Rosenberg Charity Foundation

Provide donations to : 1) canadian religious institutions 2) canadian educational institutions 3) canadian indigents.

C$712k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$642k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$17k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$53k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$642k
C$1,800
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBECC$642,319
FIRST MESIFTA OF CANADAC$42,260
VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$10,636
KOLLEL KESSER TORAHC$7,542
LAURENTIAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERC$5,000
EZRAS CHOLIM-HELP TO HEALC$1,800
AVREICHIM TORAH INSTITUTEC$1,630
ECOLE BETH TZIPORAHC$375
CONGREGATION CHASDEI BOBOVC$100
TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MONTREALC$95
SEMINARY LOAN FUND-OHR L'NEFESC$18
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.7M · 19 repeat orgsC$56k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
19

Total granted

C$2.7M
C$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+38%

Still filing today

84%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$2.1M · revenue +56% · 39% of their budget
  • FM
    First Mesifta of Canada
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$234k · revenue +58%
  • KK
    KOLLEL KESSER TORAH
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$36k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • MY
    Menusha Yeshimchagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$19k · revenue +147%
  • CC
    Centre Chabad
    one grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue -83%
  • A
    Arizalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue +78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
4
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
5
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
6
Canadian Friends of Yeshivat Wiznitz of Bnei Braq

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at yeshivat wiznitz.

—
7
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
10
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
11
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
12
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Charity Intelligence Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC — C$2,104,167 over 5y, 39% of budgetFirst Mesifta of Canada — C$233,610 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED MCB — C$133,655 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetKOLLEL KESSER TORAH — C$35,812 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS NOVOMINSK — C$30,794 over 2y, 35% of budgetVMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$18,972 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMenusha Yeshimcha — C$18,662 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBONEI OLEM FOUNDATION — C$11,174 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA MIRER JERUSALEM — C$10,104 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentre Chabad — C$9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetArizal — C$8,970 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVREICHIM TORAH INSTITUTE — C$5,676 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLAURENTIAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetYESHIVA Y'AV'NE — C$4,040 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEZRAS CHOLIM-HELP TO HEAL — C$3,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTIFERET BETH DAVID JERUSALEM SYNAGOGUE — C$3,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYeshiva Gedola — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH JACOB TEACHERS COLLEGE — C$1,301 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF LELOV YESHIVA — C$1,200 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ZERAH YAKOV — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — C$620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION CHASDEI BOBOV — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MONTREAL — C$395 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetECOLE BETH TZIPORAH — C$375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTREAL JEWISH EXPERIENCE — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOLY ASSOCIATION OF UNITED JEWISH SCHOOL — C$270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL — C$200 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPirchei Agudath Israel — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeth Jacob School of Canada — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMINARY LOAN FUND-OHR L'NEFES — C$118 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNEI LEVI FOUNDATION — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGROUPMENT COMMUNAUTAIRE BELZ — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL SHOMREI HACHOMOS — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH D&W DIVISION — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENJAMIN & VANADA TREISER MAISON SHALOM — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Shrage Zimmerman …Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Maharam Tav FundZichron David and Pes…Jewish Community Foun…Shmilu and Sari Rosen…The Friedman Family F…Aaron and Susan Liebe…Fondation Famille Neu…Charité Tzedakah Mont…D E Foundation / la F…
The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial FundQC23.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Shmilu and Sari Rosenberg Foundation · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Fondation Famille Neuhaus Neuhaus Family Foundation · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing education.

Source object 119123545:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Michael Rosenberg Charity’s filings →