Montreal, QC · Private foundation
Le Bon Esprit Fonds de Charité/The Good Mind Charitable Fund
To receive and maintain a fund or funds and apply form time to time all or part therof and the income derived therefrom to qualified donees
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$200k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE M.K FOUNDATION | C$10,644,085 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION | C$200,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE M.K FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · C$33M · revenue +10% · 87% of their budget
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOMCHE DALIM4× · 2017–2020 · C$2.4M · revenue +86%
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2024 · C$1.5M · revenue +68%
Funded once
- COCONGREGATION OHEL-CHAIMone grant, 2020 · C$4.0M
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEVone grant, 2020 · C$1.4M · revenue -35% · 58% of their budget
- CYCONGREGATION YETEV LEVone grant, 2019 · C$1.0M · revenue -22% · 54% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
Issued scholarships for religious education
Provide scholarsheps and assistance to deserving students to continue their studies at mesivta torah temimah.
Provide scholarships and financial assistance to deserving students studying at lelov yeshiva.
Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.
To provide scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses given at yeshiva tzvi.
Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.
Solicitation of donations
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Friends of Toldos Aharon and the most unlike its peers is The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE M.K FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KEREN HATZOLAH ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOMCHE DALIM ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEV ↗
- Who funds CHASDEI LEVY YITZCOK ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DIFFUSER LE SOLEIL ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOLDOS AHARON ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MESIVTA V'VIRAH OF UTA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEH ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION SATMAR DE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds CHESED L'AVRAHAM ↗
- Who funds MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED ↗
- Who funds BAIS TEFFILLOH FRANKLIN ↗
- Who funds ANIYEI IRCHO ↗
- Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
- Who funds TIKVAH L'CHAIM/TZOHAR ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION BELZ ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR ↗
- Who funds KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Maharam Tav Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Menucha Vesimcha · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Académie Beth Esther Inc. / Beth Esther Academy Inc. · Congregation Sheves Achim · Centre chabad · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.