Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Institution Tashbar

Scolarships bursaries awards public education study programs encourage youth educational growth & achievements interest free loans

C$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$17k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$37k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$111k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZC$17,000
CONGREGATION BELZC$10,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BELZC$10,000
FISHMAN FAMILY FDTMC$3,600
BNOT JERUSALEM KINDERGARTEN AND GIRL'S SCHOOC$400
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$270k · 12 repeat orgsC$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

C$270k
C$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOLLEL CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZ
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$55k · revenue +128%
  • BC
    BELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$36k · revenue +66%
  • KB
    KEHILAT BELZ
    3× · 2018–2023 · C$35k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • CI
    CONGR. IMREU CHAIM WIZNITZ
    one grant, 2023 · C$18k · revenue +7%
  • AH
    AHAVAT HESSED
    one grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue +24%
  • C
    C.F.O.B.
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
4
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
5
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
6
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
7
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
8
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
9
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
10
Tav College / Collège Tav

To provide premises purchased classroom equipment and computers hired instructors etc to teach marketable skills and secular training towards employment for students who require a jewish environment during classes.

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Rav Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZ — C$54,600 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$35,810 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKEHILAT BELZ — C$34,830 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$30,800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF WIZNITZ BNEI BRAQ — C$30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCONGR. IMREU CHAIM WIZNITZ — C$17,675 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY BUILDING FUND — C$17,100 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetARIZAL — C$14,480 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS JERUSALEM — C$14,040 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMCB — C$12,950 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBnoth Jerusalem Girls School — C$12,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMENOUCHA VESIMHA — C$11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BELZ — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWiznitz Community Center — C$1,856 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBETH YAAKOV SEMINARY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAV HESSED — C$610 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCTM — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVMM — C$101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF TOWN — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Centre chabadCongrégation BelzThe Friedman Family F…Jewish Community Foun…Maharam Tav FundSemeurs De Charité/ Z…Institution Viznitz /…Fondation de la Famil…Menucha Vesimcha
Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB)QC17.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Centre chabad · Congrégation Belz · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Maharam Tav Fund · Semeurs De Charité/ Zoreah Tzedokos · Institution Viznitz / Viznitz Institution · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 871594644:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Institution Tashbar’s filings →