Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages.

C$37k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$11,488
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$-127205
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$14,723
CONGREGATION BELZC$11,488
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$11,288
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 75% of grant dollars (C$187k). The 25% that went abroad (C$64k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 25% of all-years giving (C$64k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$195k · 12 repeat orgsC$55k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

C$195k
C$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+35%

Still filing today

75%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$32k · revenue +80%
  • MV
    MENUCHA VESIMCHA
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$31k · revenue +34%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZ
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$24k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · C$7k · revenue +24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · C$6k
  • IC
    IMRAY CHAIM D'WITZNITZgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$6k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
4
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
5
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
6
Belz Community Center

Solicit receive and maintain funds for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethlical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
7
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
8
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
9
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
10
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
11
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
12
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Kupas Hachesed Meoroth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$32,028 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$30,583 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$23,901 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$10,190 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY KOLLEL — C$9,020 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$7,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONG BOBOV — C$7,535 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$6,618 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM D'WITZNITZ — C$5,980 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUT KOLLEL NOAM — C$4,800 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTORAS HOSHE ACADEMIE — C$4,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH ESTHER — C$3,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHASDEI SHLOMO — C$3,765 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISHKAN HATORAH — C$2,640 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETH TZIPORAH SCHOOL — C$2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS YEROUSHALAYIM — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKEHILA BELZ — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION ZICHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZ — C$580 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIZNITZ INST. — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONG YETEV LEV — C$75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Maharam Tav FundMenucha VesimchaThe Micha Life Founda…Rosenberg Family Foun…Institution Viznitz /…The M.K. Foundation/L…Jewish Community Foun…Kolel of Congregation…Congregation Sheves A…
Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah MontrealQC18.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Maharam Tav Fund · Menucha Vesimcha · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Institution Viznitz / Viznitz Institution · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz · Congregation Sheves Achim

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 816106173:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud’s filings →