Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Cote Saint-Luc, QC · Charitable organization

Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

C$531k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$304k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$20k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$83k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$124k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$304k
C$6,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$304,331
CHEDER HASEPHARADI/THE SEPHARADIC CHEDERC$124,405
FONDATION FAMILLE NATAFC$40,000
THE YAD EZER FUNDC$22,800
ASSOCIATION PENIMIC$19,800
ACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉC$6,000
CAISSE BETH YOSSEFC$4,000
CONGREGATION EITZ CHAIMC$3,000
CONGREGATION CHOUVA ISRAELC$3,000
COMMUNAUTÉ SÉPHARADE DE CÔTE ST-LUC BETH RAMBAMC$2,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONALC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.9M · 13 repeat orgsC$194k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

C$2.9M
C$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YESHIVA OHR ISRAEL
    3× · 2017–2023 · C$732k · revenue +11% · 99% of their budget
  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$529k · revenue +21%
  • CH
    CHEDER HASEPHARADI/THE SEPHARADIC CHEDER
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$335k · revenue +846%

Funded once

  • YO
    YESHIVA OHR ISRAEL
    one grant, 2022 · C$38k
  • VM
    Vaad Mishmeres Mitzvos
    one grant, 2017 · C$32k
  • CB
    CAISSE BETH YOSSEF
    one grant, 2019 · C$29k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
3
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
4
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
5
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
6
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
7
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
8
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
9
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
10
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
Experience Juive / Jewish Experience

To promote and encourage jewish education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Education Program / Programme éducatif juif and the most unlike its peers is Association Penimi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION FAMILLE NATAF — C$1,043,987 over 5y, 14% of budgetYESHIVA OHR ISRAEL — C$731,500 over 3y, 99% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$528,569 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCHEDER HASEPHARADI/THE SEPHARADIC CHEDER — C$334,735 over 5y, 12% of budgetCAISSE BETH YOSSEF — C$49,500 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$48,450 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetASSOCIATION PENIMI — C$41,580 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTHE CHEVRA — C$35,283 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPEER HETORAH — C$35,225 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetFONDATION DES ENFANTS DE TSFAT — C$27,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetHATZOLOS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$14,220 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCongregation Chouva Israel — C$8,600 over 2y, 15% of budgetACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉ — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION EITZ CHAIM — C$3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ SÉPHARADE DE CÔTE ST-LUC BETH RAMBAM — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTREAL TORAH CENTER — C$1,284 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION PROGRAM — C$780 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMontreal Community Kollel Keter Torah — C$540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENUHA VESIMHA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNAUTE SEPHARADE DE LAVAL — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECOLE PREMIERE MESIFTA — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$37 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Gad and Sandra Bitton…Zichron David and Pes…Rayjo Charitable TrustCharité Tzedakah Mont…Institut CBMResidence Sepharade S…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…The Friedman Family F…Menucha Vesimcha
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC16.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Gad and Sandra Bitton Family Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Institut CBM · Residence Sepharade Salomon (Communaute Sepharade Unifiee Du Quebec) · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Menucha Vesimcha

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations advancing religion.

Source object 853233740:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim’s filings →