Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Residence Sepharade Salomon (Communaute Sepharade Unifiee Du Quebec)
Organiser des offres religieux.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k10 grants · C$22k
- C$10k–50k7 grants · C$99k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CSUQ | C$28,800 |
| FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE MAIMONIDE | C$15,000 |
| CHABAD HOPE CENTRE | C$12,600 |
| VMM | C$11,720 |
| CTM | C$11,000 |
| REFUAH V'HESSED | C$10,000 |
| CANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM | C$10,000 |
| HATZOLOH RESCUE SQUAD | C$5,000 |
| ACADENIE YESHIVA YAVNE | C$5,000 |
| HA' ARI ZA' L | C$2,660 |
| MONTREAL BRESLEV CENTER INSTITUT | C$2,600 |
| CCBY | C$2,600 |
| INSTITUT GUEDER CHEL TORAH | C$1,000 |
| MENUCHA VESIMCH | C$1,000 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$34k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CSComm. Stépharade Unifiée de Québec7× · 2017–2024 · C$331k · revenue +25%
- VVMM5× · 2020–2024 · C$176k · revenue +47%
- MOMIGDAL OHR3× · 2021–2023 · C$63k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- HFHEBREW FREE LOANone grant, 2023 · C$50k · revenue +20%
- CCSUQone grant, 2020 · C$49k
- AYACADEMIE YESHIVA YAVNEone grant, 2023 · C$29k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.
École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse
Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture
Synagogue
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institut Gueder Chel Torah and the most unlike its peers is Institution Tashbar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Comm. Stépharade Unifiée de Québec (CSUQ) ↗
- Who funds VMM ↗
- Who funds MIGDAL OHR ↗
- Who funds CENTRE CHABAD ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM FOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds HATZOLOH RESCUE SQUAD OF MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds CAISSE BETH YOSSEF ↗
- Who funds REFUAH V'HESSED ↗
- Who funds FONDATION COMMUNAUTAIRE JUIVE ↗
- Who funds CTM ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE MAIMONIDE ↗
- Who funds CHABAD HOPE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds HA' ARI ZA'L ↗
- Who funds GRAND RABBINA DU QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds BNAI LAVY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANZEIKI TORAH ↗
- Who funds MONTREAL BRESLEV CENTER ↗
- Who funds CONG SKVER ↗
- Who funds MADA ↗
- Who funds CTM ↗
- Who funds MENUCHA VESIMCH ↗
- Who funds ACADENIE YESHIVA YAVNE ↗
- Who funds THE NE'EMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHABAD UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL ↗
- Who funds KH MENOROT ↗
- Who funds TORAH V YIRA RABBINICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHIM ↗
- Who funds MAOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds BANAV ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · Federation Cja · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Zolfam Matan Bceter Foundation · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Maharam Tav Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.