Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation de la Famille Frankforter Frankforter Family Foundation

Beneficial for the community to further its purposes (as defined in the governing documents).

C$971k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$971k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$971,075
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS CHERNOBELC$971,075
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.3M · 7 repeat orgsC$1.4M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
29

Total granted

C$2.3M
C$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-15%
+47%

Still filing today

100%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ARIZAL
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$377k · revenue +78%
  • MV
    Menucha Vesimcha
    2× · 2017–2020 · C$145k · revenue +147%
  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUND
    2× · 2017–2020 · C$29k · revenue +238%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$588k
  • AI
    Aniyei Irchograduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$174k · revenue +320%
  • V
    VMM
    one grant, 2017 · C$168k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
4
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
5
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
6
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
7
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
8
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
9
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
10
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
11
Institut Gueder Chel Torah

Promouvoir l'étude de torah et la formation des futurs dirigeants religieux supporter la pratique les besoins religieux culturelles et traditionnelles de la communauté juive assistance pour les nécessiteux dans la communauté juive

—
12
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre chabad and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS CHERNOBEL — C$1,561,782 over 4y, 61% of budgetARIZAL — C$377,389 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAniyei Ircho — C$173,800 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetMCB — C$164,185 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMenucha Vesimcha — C$144,945 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetBeth Oloth — C$132,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$29,105 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKollel Noam Eliezer — C$28,400 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetKehal Themach Tzaddik — C$26,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetWiznitz Institution — C$18,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBeth Rivka Academy — C$12,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetÉcole Première Mesifta du Canada — C$10,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHTZOLOH DW — C$9,800 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetThe Family Store — C$8,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MONTREAL CENTRE FOR HEALTH AND CARE — C$7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTRE CHABAD — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChevrah Mesamchei Lev — C$7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCong. Amour pour Israel — C$6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCong. Bath Israel of Trout Lake — C$5,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetThe Montreal Torah Center — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYam Hatalmud — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCong. Schem Achim — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAOR YISRAEL — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCongregation Skvere — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVMM — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRabbinical College of Canada — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE OF S. LAZARE — C$770 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hatzolas Yisroel D'ArizalQC22.5× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Maharam Tav Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial Fund · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 775428527:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation de la Famille Frankforter Frankforter Family’s filings →