Skip to content

Boisbriand, QC · Private foundation

Ezer Lanefesh Foundation / E.L.F.

Relief of poverty through tangible disbursements and providing food and shelter to the needy.

C$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$83k
  • C$10k–50k17 grants · C$410k
  • C$50k–250k7 grants · C$790k
C$15,744
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$378k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BNEI LEVY FOUNDATIONC$200,303
CENTRAL TZEDAKAH INC.C$177,520
EIZER MESHILEM FEISHC$112,500
Individual grant recipientC$103,798
Individual grant recipientC$83,133
CONG. KHAL YEREIM YESHIVA BAIS HILLELC$60,304
CONGREGATION SHIMIE DVAR HASHEMC$52,649
CONGREGATION TORAS EMES.C$43,481
BAIS TZIRELC$38,742
CONGREGATION BNAI YOELC$33,137
REFUGEC$33,026
BEER MIRIAMC$31,479
YESHIVA TIFERES MESHILEM D'TOSHC$30,777
Individual grant recipientC$29,312
Individual grant recipientC$26,661
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 22% of grant dollars (C$457k). The 78% that went abroad (C$1.6M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 78% of all-years giving (C$1.6M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$1.5M · 39 grants
ILC$59k · 2 grants
GBC$33k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$518k · 7 repeat orgsC$1.6M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

C$518k
C$745k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$831k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BNEI LEVY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$204k · revenue -7%
  • CT
    CENTRAL TZEDAKAH INC.
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$192k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TORAS EMES.
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$50k

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KHAL YEREIM YESHIVA BAIS HILLEL
    one grant, 2023 · C$369k
  • CR
    CONGREGATION RIBNITZ INC
    one grant, 2023 · C$189k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$38k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
4
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
5
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
6
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
7
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
8
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
9
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
10
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
11
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
12
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Communautaire Bnois Yisroel and the most unlike its peers is Chevrah Msamchei Lev. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
1/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBNEI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$203,553 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH — C$112,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBAIS TZIREL — C$38,742 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$18,376 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREB MAYER BAAL HANES - CHIBAS JERUALEM — C$15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEV — C$12,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROEL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE — C$9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$8,065 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARIZAL — C$6,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZURACH BACHOSHECH — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCHABAD OF CENTREPOINTE — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCONGRÉGATION SEPHARADE BETH HILLEL TIFERET DAVID — C$1,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHI LEV — C$975 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BNEI LEVY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EIZER MESHILEM FEISH ↗
  • Who funds BAIS TZIREL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds REB MAYER BAAL HANES - CHIBAS JERUALEM ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YETEV LEV ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maharam Tav FundQC15.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation B'NAI LEVY / B'NAI LEVY Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer · Congregation Sheves Achim · The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial Fund · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 783246804:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ezer Lanefesh Foundation / E.L.F.’s filings →