Skip to content

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

Congregation Eitz Chaim

Congregation for religious services & adult education classes

C$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$20k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$90k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YAD V'EZERC$10,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAC$10,000
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$3,700
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$88k · 4 repeat orgsC$11k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$88k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+30%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLA
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$50k
  • YV
    YAD V'EZER
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$22k · revenue -7%
  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$15k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +242%
  • BO
    BETH OLATH
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TZEMACH
    one grant, 2017 · C$800 · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Moshe Synagogue

To operate a synagogue

—
2
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
3
Congregation Kahal Yereim
—
4
Shaar Shalom Synagogue
—
5
Kolel Mareh Yechkel Congregation

To carry on a synagogue and enhance religious awareness

—
6
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
7
Congregation Zichron Yakov Yitzchok Belz
—
8
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
9
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
10
Congregation Tiferes Yaakov

Maintain a synagogue for prayer and worship according to the practice of orthodox judaism.

—
11
Congregation Shir Chadash Inc

Operation of a jewish synagogue.

—
12
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Sheves Achim and the most unlike its peers is Vmm Zichron Chaim Charity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYAD V'EZER — C$21,875 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$15,020 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETH OLATH — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV — C$1,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION TZEMACH — C$800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOLLEL KESSER TORAH — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB)QC10.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Congrégation Reshith Chochma Première Mesifta du Canada / Congregation Reshith Chochma First Mesifta of Canada · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Menucha Vesimcha · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 891437279:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congregation Eitz Chaim’s filings →