Skip to content

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

C$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$52k
C$1,214
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEREN HABINYAC$18,400
IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZC$16,650
THE YAD EZER FUNDC$16,625
CONGREGATION ATERETH ZEKAINIM/CONGREGATION DES SENIORS COUROC$8,000
EZRAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUNDC$5,000
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$1,214
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$1,000
CONGREGATION ZERA KODESHC$1,000
CORPS DE BÉNÉVOLES HATZOLOHC$872
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB)C$430
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZALC$350
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$207k · 10 repeat orgsC$80k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

C$207k
C$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    IMPAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$79k · revenue +35%
  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZERA KODESH
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$9k · revenue +163%
  • CT
    CHARITÉ TZESAKAH MONTRÉAL / CHARITY TZEDAKAH
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$4k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • GZ
    GEMACH ZICHRON BURECH ZVIgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$60k · revenue +28%
  • BE
    BETH ESTHER ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$650 · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Gemach Zichron Yechiel

This organization provides interest-free loans to persons of low income.

—
4
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
5
Chesed L'Yakov Free Loan / Prêt sans intérêts La bonté de Yakov

To provide interest free loans to needy people.

—
6
Shaare Zedek Synagogue Foundation

Solicit and collect charitable donations in order to create a capital fund the purpose of which capital fund shall be to generate income in order to provide funds required for the operations of shaare zedek congregation

—
7
Tzidkas Yisorel

The organization intends to operate as a charitable foundation whose purpose is primarily to make donations to qualified donees.

—
8
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
9
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
10
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
11
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
12
Ozer Israel

The organization donates and lends money to individuals in need

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim and the most unlike its peers is Corps de bénévoles Hatzoloh division Outremont. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIMPAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ — C$78,650 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetGEMACH ZICHRON BURECH ZVI — C$60,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetEZRAS MENACHEM AVROHOM LOAN FUND — C$50,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$48,775 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetKEREN HABINYA — C$18,400 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetCONGREGATION ZERA KODESH — C$8,520 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCONGREGATION ATERETH ZEKAINIM/CONGREGATION DES SENIORS COURO — C$8,201 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITÉ TZESAKAH MONTRÉAL / CHARITY TZEDAKAH — C$4,471 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL — C$2,940 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$2,795 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONGTREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORPS DE BÉNÉVOLES HATZOLOH — C$872 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) — C$717 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ESTHER ACADEMY — C$650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC14.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav · The Leo & Bina Kohn Foundation Inc./Fondation Leo & Bina Kohn Inc. · Les Amis Canadiens de Torah Vyirah Rabbinical College · Chevrah Msamchei Lev · Congregation Sheves Achim

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 718572332:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Congrégation Charidem’s filings →