Cote Saint-Luc, QC · Charitable organization
Congrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L.
To operate a synagogue.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BONEI OLAM FOUNDATION INC. | C$9,860 |
| CHABAD CHAI CENTER | C$5,725 |
| BETH RIVKAH ACADEMY | C$3,600 |
| EZRAS ACHIM CONGREGATION OF BROTHERLY HELP | C$1,600 |
| FONDATION-EL-HASHORESH-CANADA | C$1,000 |
| CHABAD CÔTE-DES-NEIGES | C$900 |
| CHABAD ÉTUDIANTS JUIFS FRANCOPHONES | C$350 |
| ACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉ | C$161 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$20k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BRBETH RIVKAH ACADEMY3× · 2019–2024 · C$11k · revenue +42%
- CMCOMMUNAUTE MADA2× · 2018–2020 · C$6k · revenue +30%
- COCHABAD OF TOWN OF MOUNT ROYAL2× · 2018–2019 · C$4k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- COCHABAD OF VILLE ST. LAURENTgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$11k · revenue +50%
- EMECOLE MAIMONIDEone grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue -4%
- CGCAMP GAN ISRAELgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue ×27
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
To advance religion by teaching religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith by setting up jewish courses for men and women of all ages.
To operate a synagague and promote jewish religieus and moral and ethical values and practices
A fournir et a renforcer les programmes en hebreu culturelles et religieuses et des milieux de la jeunesse juivee et promouvoir la formation du caractère er du civisme.
Services religieux activites de synagogue célébrations religieuse
Fostering and conducting religious jewish educating in bc
Providing religious programming including seminars and lectures. maintining a synagogue for daily religious services provide subsidized kosher meals for students. sponsoring social events that promote humanity. sponsoring social events…
Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.
Office religieux activites de promotion de la culture religieuse juive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of the Town of Mount Royal and the most unlike its peers is Chabad Lubavitch of the Waterloo Region. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHABAD OF VILLE ST. LAURENT ↗
- Who funds BETH RIVKAH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNAUTE MADA ↗
- Who funds CHABAD CHAI CENTER ↗
- Who funds ECOLE MAIMONIDE ↗
- Who funds CAMP GAN ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds RABBINCAL COLLEGE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF TOWN OF MOUNT ROYAL ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF WATERLOO ↗
- Who funds CHAYA MUSHKA SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds EZRAS ACHIM CONGREGATION OF BROTHERLY HELP ↗
- Who funds MIVTZOIM ↗
- Who funds CENTRE SEPHARDE DE TORA ↗
- Who funds FONDATION-EL-HASHORESH-CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHARITY TZEDAKAH ↗
- Who funds MAON NOAM CONGREGATION ↗
- Who funds CHABAD CÔTE-DES-NEIGES ↗
- Who funds CHABAD ÉTUDIANTS JUIFS FRANCOPHONES ↗
- Who funds MIFAL CHAIM BECHESED ↗
- Who funds ACADÉMIE YÉSHIVA YAVNÉ ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Association Chabad sur le Campus · Rayjo Charitable Trust · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · Federation Cja · Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.