Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Communauté Chabad Montréal Ouest

Operate a synagogue

C$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$33k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$14k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$68k
C$5,850
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH RIVKA ACADEMYC$32,620
YALDEI ARONC$25,000
OHR MENACHEMC$10,000
ZICHRON VMMC$5,850
CHABAD CHAI CENTREC$5,338
LE CENTRE JUIF DE MONTRÉAL-OUEST-CHABAD WESTMINSTERC$1,800
CONGREGATION CHABADC$482
EZRAS ACHIMC$101
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$198k · 4 repeat orgsC$182k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

C$198k
C$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+59%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BETH RIVKA ACADEMY
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$49k · revenue +23%
  • ZV
    ZICHRON VMM
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$10k · revenue +47%
  • CC
    CHABAD CHAI CENTRE
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$10k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • Y
    YALDEIgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$120k · revenue +59%
  • J
    JRCCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$13k · revenue +110%
  • T
    TFS
    one grant, 2020 · C$9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
4
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
5
Congregation Shir Chadash Inc

Operation of a jewish synagogue.

—
6
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
7
Chabad of Downtown Vancouver

Fostering and conducting religious jewish educating in bc

—
8
Kollel Derech Chaim
—
9
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
10
Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill

The organization carries out religious and cultural programs to the jewish community in richmond hill and surrounding area

—
11
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
12
Centre Chabad Chabanel

The charity operates a synagogue to provide educational activities and religious services.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L. and the most unlike its peers is The Chabad Lubavitch Non-Profit Loan Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$128,591 over 3y, 27% of budgetYALDEI — C$120,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBETH RIVKA ACADEMY — C$49,290 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYALDEI ARON — C$25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetJRCC — C$13,016 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOHR MENACHEM — C$10,482 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetZICHRON VMM — C$10,225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD CHAI CENTRE — C$9,911 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLE CENTRE JUIF DE MONTRÉAL-OUEST-CHABAD WESTMINSTER — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCONG LOUBAVITCH — C$846 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY — C$519 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCONGREGATION D'ANASH — C$312 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetEZRAS ACHIM — C$101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

L'Organisation de la …Centre Chabad De Vill…Congregation de L'Aid…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Rayjo Charitable TrustJewish Community Foun…Le Centre Chabad Vill…Chaya Mushka Seminary…Zichron David and Pes…Federation CjaFondation Familiale G…My Charity Fund
L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth OrganizationQC11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Le Centre Chabad Ville St-Laurent · Chaya Mushka Seminary - Ben Weider Educational Centre - Chabad Seminary · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Federation Cja · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · My Charity Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 829776988:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Communauté Chabad Montréal Ouest’s filings →