Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Chaya Mushka Seminary - Ben Weider Educational Centre - Chabad Seminary

To provide teaching in jewish studies to young women of post high school age to become teachers in jewish studies courses.

C$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k19 grants · C$20k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$450
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD CENTREC$10,000
ZICHRON YAAKOVC$3,530
KEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZC$3,000
EZRAS ACHIMC$2,867
CHABAD CHAI CTRC$2,500
HATZOLAS YISROEL DARIZALC$2,340
FRIENDS OF KIRYAT HAYELEDC$2,000
CONGREGATION LUBAVITCHC$880
YALDEI FOUNDATIONC$500
CHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHLMC$450
R.C.C.C$400
CONGREGATION BETH CHABADC$360
CHABAD LUBAVITCH YOUTH ORGANIZATIONC$360
ANSHEI LUBAVITCH SHOMIMC$324
VAAD MISHMERES MITZVAHC$218
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$207k · 15 repeat orgsC$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

C$207k
C$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+17%

Still filing today

93%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • R
    R.C.C.
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$116k · revenue +58%
  • BR
    Beth Rivka Academy
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$14k · revenue +41%
  • CC
    CHABAD CHAI CTR
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$11k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH YOUTH ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2019 · C$7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • C
    C.T.M.
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
4
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
5
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
6
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
7
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
8
Centre Communautaire Chabad de Saint-Lazare

Services religieux activites de synagogue célébrations religieuse

—
9
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
10
Yeshiva Gedolah L'ecole D'etudes Superieures De Montreal

The charity opertes a school for jewish children

—
11
Centre Communautaire Belz Avreichim Belz Avreichim Community Center

Providing jewish courses for men and women of all ages operating a jewish community center

—
12
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization and the most unlike its peers is Quality Chinuch/Education De Qualite. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetR.C.C. — C$116,296 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — C$16,300 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBeth Rivka Academy — C$14,165 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD CHAI CTR — C$11,208 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEZRAS ACHIM — C$11,027 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCHABAD CENTRE — C$10,970 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$8,218 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMHA — C$6,850 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetZICHRON YAAKOV — C$5,230 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL DARIZAL — C$2,340 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIRYAT HAYELED — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ZICHRON KEDOSHIM — C$1,625 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONG. BETH CHABAD CSL — C$1,135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN MENACHEM — C$1,130 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHATZOLAH — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION AMOUR POUR ISRAEL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUALITY CHINUCH — C$720 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFELINE CENTER — C$586 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAURENTIAN JEWISH CENTER — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYALDEI FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ALBERTA — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE SEPHARDE — C$371 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANSHEI LUBAVITCH SHOMIM — C$324 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONG. BETH ISRAEL BETH AARON — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD TMR — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION SHOMRIM LABOKER — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FREINDSHIP CIRCLE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNACHLAS — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Jewish Community Foun…Rayjo Charitable TrustFondation Familiale G…Federation CjaMaharam Tav FundZolfam Matan Bceter F…Aaron and Susan Liebe…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Organisation Chabad W…L'Organisation de la …
Hatzolas Yisroel D'ArizalQC20.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Federation Cja · Maharam Tav Fund · Zolfam Matan Bceter Foundation · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Organisation Chabad Westmount Westmount Chabad Organization · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 106741978:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chaya Mushka Seminary - Ben Weider Educational Centre - Chabad Seminary’s filings →