Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Communauté Détenteurs Religieux Belza / CDRB / Kehal Machzikei Hadas Belz / KMHB

The organization is promoting observance of the orthodox jewish faith by conducting religious celebrations and feasts weekly and on religious holidays relieve poverty by providing food clothing and expenses to low income people.

C$865k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$350k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k15 grants · C$30k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$66k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$420k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$350k
C$2,837
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$756k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGRÉGATION BELZ C.S.L.C$350,000
KEHILAS BELZC$224,388
KEREN HEKEHILAHC$120,000
THE YAD EZER FUNDC$75,175
CONGREGATION BELZC$44,254
KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZC$21,650
BELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOLC$6,970
CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEVC$5,000
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZALC$4,300
BELZ AVREICHIM COMMUNITY CENTERC$3,900
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSSOS CHASIDEI BELZC$2,837
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESEDC$1,840
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉALC$1,303
MAISON BELZ MONTREALC$945
BELZ COMMUNITY CENTERC$601
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$957k · 13 repeat orgsC$514k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

C$957k
C$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-4%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$474k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KB
    KEHILAS BELZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$392k · revenue +144%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$67k · revenue +8%
  • KO
    KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$30k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAS CHESED
    one grant, 2023 · C$12k · revenue -58%
  • CC
    CENTRE CHABADgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue +45%
  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MONTEAL
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
4
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
5
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
6
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
7
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
8
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
9
Shaare Zedek Synagogue Foundation

Solicit and collect charitable donations in order to create a capital fund the purpose of which capital fund shall be to generate income in order to provide funds required for the operations of shaare zedek congregation

—
10
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
11
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
12
La Fondation Humanitaire Breslov

To provide funds for the religious and spiritual activities of the Breslov community.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
13/32
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKEHILAS BELZ — C$391,928 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetCONGRÉGATION BELZ C.S.L. — C$350,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetYAD VEZER FUND — C$267,675 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetMAISON BELZ MONTREAL — C$128,185 over 2y, 11% of budgetKEREN HEKEHILAH — C$120,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$67,324 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZ — C$30,350 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBNOTH JERUSALEM — C$21,075 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$15,800 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAS CHESED — C$12,242 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHEILEV — C$10,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRE CHABAD — C$9,875 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MONTEAL — C$9,695 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSOOS CHASIDE BELZ — C$7,539 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$6,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERKAZ HACHINUCH — C$6,360 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBNOTH JERUSALEM — C$4,179 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL — C$1,928 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED — C$1,840 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION ZICHRON YAKOV YITZCHOCK BETZ — C$1,405 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBNOH JERUSALEM SEMINARY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY CENTER — C$601 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRÉGATION BETH CHABAD C.S.L. — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$420 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION MACHZIKEI TORAH OF MONT — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBONEI OLAM FOUNDATION INC. — C$215 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION AMOUR POUR ISRAËL — C$196 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAT YISRAEL — C$132 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEZRATH TORAH FUND — C$101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH VCHESED — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah MontrealQC27.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Menucha Vesimcha · Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire Belz · Congrégation Belz · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 748023538:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Communauté Détenteurs Religieux Belza / CDRB / Kehal Machzikei Hadas Belz / KMHB’s filings →