Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

College Rabbinique de Québec qui soutient les Loyaux Étudiants du Rabbin Ménachem

Post graduate rabbinical seminary assistance to seminary students study group seminary & field trips

C$13k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$11k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
C$11,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBECC$11,000
CONGREGATION ZEIREI DA'AS VODAATHC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$508k · 4 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$508k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+66%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • VZ
    V.M.M. ZIGHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$402k · revenue -6%
  • CR
    CONG. RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC
    2× · 2018–2023 · C$100k · revenue -50%
  • CC
    COMMUNAUTE CHABAD MONTREAL QUEST
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONG ONEG SHABBOS
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -32%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +58%
  • ML
    MESIVTA LOUBAVITCH TORONTOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +120%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Israel of Montreal

Synagogue

—
2
Congregation Shir Chadash Inc

Operation of a jewish synagogue.

—
3
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
4
Zichron Moshe Synagogue

To operate a synagogue

—
5
Congrégation Anshei Yisroel/Anshei Yisroel Congregation

Operate synagogue congregation etude religieuses

—
6
Communauté Chabad de Mont-Tremblant

To operate a synagague and promote jewish religieus and moral and ethical values and practices

—
7
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
8
Congregation Chouva Israel

Operer un synagogue

—
9
Congregation of the Followers of the Rabbi of Lubavitch

Operated and maintained a place of worship hold religious studies mainten cemetary

—
10
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
11
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
12
Synagogue Un Arbre De Vie-Or Menachem / Synagogue Etz Haim-Hi Lamachazikim Bah-Or Menachem

To provide and operate a synagogue

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation College Rabbinique Du Quebec / Congregation Rabbinical College of Quebec and the most unlike its peers is Vmm Zichron Chaim Charity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetV.M.M. ZIGHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$402,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCONG. RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC — C$100,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCOMMUNAUTE CHABAD MONTREAL QUEST — C$3,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCONGREGATION ZEIREI DA'AS VODAATH — C$3,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCONG ONEG SHABBOS — C$2,175 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMESIVTA LOUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI CENTRE — C$54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chabad Chai Center / …Rayjo Charitable TrustJewish Community Foun…Congregation Bais Men…Maharam Tav FundMy Charity FundOneg Shabbos Congrega…Camp jardin d'Hannah …Nachlas Educational C…L'Organisation de la …Fondation de la Famil…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…
Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad ChaiQC10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Maharam Tav Fund · My Charity Fund · Oneg Shabbos Congregation · Camp jardin d'Hannah (Pardas Chanah)/ Garden Of Hannah Camp (Pardas Chanah) · Nachlas Educational Centre · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Fondation de la Famille Nataf/Nataf Family Foundation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 891583049:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on College Rabbinique de Québec qui soutient les Loyaux Étudiants du Rabbin Ménachem’s filings →