Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Camp jardin d'Hannah (Pardas Chanah)/ Garden Of Hannah Camp (Pardas Chanah)

The charity promotes religious education and operates a summer camp for girls

C$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CGIC$6,000
MESIFTA LUBAVITCH TORONTOC$4,300
RABBINICAL COLLEGE CANADAC$4,170
CONGREGATION NUSACH HOARIC$1,000
CHABAD CHAI CENTERC$400
CHABAD NON PROFIT LOAN ORGANIZATIONC$220
BETH RIVKAC$220
RABBINICAL COLLEGE QUEBECC$150
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$57k). The 17% that went abroad (C$12k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$12k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$40k · 5 repeat orgsC$29k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

C$40k
C$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+41%

Still filing today

60%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Beth Rivkah
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$19k · revenue +33%
  • CG
    CAMP GAN ISRAEL
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$7k
  • ML
    MESIFTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO
    3× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • BA
    BELZ AVREICHIM COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue +32%
  • CG
    CAMP GARDEN (GAN) ISRAEL
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +19%
  • V
    VMMgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
2
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
3
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
4
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
5
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
6
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
7
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
8
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
9
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
10
Yeshiva Gedolah L'ecole D'etudes Superieures De Montreal

The charity opertes a school for jewish children

—
11
L'École Beth Tziporah

The charity operates an elementary and high school for jewish girls

—
12
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College Rabbinique Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Chabad Lubavitch Non-Profit Loan Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBeth Rivkah — C$19,170 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMESIFTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$6,030 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION NUSACH HOARI — C$5,800 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetBELZ AVREICHIM COMMUNITY CENTER — C$5,100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE CANADA — C$4,170 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP GARDEN (GAN) ISRAEL — C$2,890 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVMM — C$2,678 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD MONTREAL WEST — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRabbinical College of Canada — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChabad West — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD CHAI CENTER — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD NON PROFIT LOAN ORGANIZATION — C$220 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maharam Tav FundQC13.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · The George Kohn Charitable Foundation / la Fondation Charitable George Kohn · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-09-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 118935212:2024-09-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Camp jardin d'Hannah (Pardas Chanah)/ Garden Of Hannah Camp (Pardas Chanah)’s filings →