Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montréal, QC · Charitable organization

Chasdei Shlomo

Charitable activities to relieve poverty

C$46k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
2
Regions reached
C$11k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$25k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$21k
C$7,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$604k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YAM HATALMUD FOUNDATIONC$10,997
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS WIZNITZ BBC$10,000
KAV SHALOMC$9,000
CONGR. IMRAY CHAIMC$7,500
MISHKAN HATORAHC$6,500
CONGREGATION ZICHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZC$1,000
CONTGREGATION BELZC$1,000
BOBOV CONGREGATIONC$300
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 84% of grant dollars (C$281k). The 16% that went abroad (C$55k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 16% of all-years giving (C$55k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$179k · 7 repeat orgsC$157k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +182% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

C$179k
C$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+182%
+24%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONG ATERER SHLOMO
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$75k · revenue +225% · 52% of their budget
  • YS
    YESHIVA SHEERIT HAPLETA
    4× · 2019–2022 · C$15k · revenue +538%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZ
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$14k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEH
    one grant, 2022 · C$50k · revenue -26%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABANIM
    one grant, 2020 · C$48k
  • AT
    AHAVAT TZEDAKA VAHESSED
    one grant, 2018 · C$7k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
4
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
5
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
6
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
7
Congregation Kahal Yereim
—
8
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
9
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
10
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
11
Hatzolas Yisroel D'arizal

To advance education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to students at mosdos belz school in israel. to relieve poverty by providing financial assistance and interest-free loans to the poor. and to undertake activities…

—
12
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Tefiloh Lemoishe Congregation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONG ATERER SHLOMO — C$75,400 over 5y, 52% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEH — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYESHIVA SHEERIT HAPLETA — C$15,243 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$14,490 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYAM HATALMUD FOUNDATION — C$12,997 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS WIZNITZ BB — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGR. IMRAY CHAIM — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMISHKAN HATORAH — C$6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZICHRON BAROUCK — C$4,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$2,850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOAM ELIEZER — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMCB — C$1,480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG GATE DAVID OF BOBOV — C$1,160 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCONGREGATION ZICHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZ — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORAS MOSHE SATMAR — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEFILO LEMOSHE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELZ HEDER ECOLE — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Maharam Tav FundRosenberg Family Foun…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Fondation de la Famil…Menucha VesimchaThe Micha Life Founda…D E Foundation / la F…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…The M.K. Foundation/L…Zichron David and Pes…
Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah MontrealQC19.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 823931357:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chasdei Shlomo’s filings →