Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Centre Communautaire Belz Avreichim Belz Avreichim Community Center
Providing jewish courses for men and women of all ages operating a jewish community center
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$3k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$27k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KMHB | C$26,736 |
| BONEI OLAM | C$1,562 |
| MCB | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- KBKOLEL BELZ5× · 2017–2021 · C$95k · revenue +158%
- MVMENUCHA VSIMCHA3× · 2019–2023 · C$78k · revenue +148%
- HAHATSOLO ARIZAL2× · 2017–2019 · C$61k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- KBKEHILAS BELZgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$44k · revenue +167%
- ATACADEMY TORAS MOSHEone grant, 2020 · C$10k
- YHYAM HATALMOUDgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$4k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.
Funding for seminaries and other religious colleges.
Solicitation of donations
To print and publish religious books. to assist in the printing of the talmud code of jewish law and other religious texts.
Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…
Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Rav Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KOLEL BELZ ↗
- Who funds MENUCHA VSIMCHA ↗
- Who funds HATSOLO ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds KEHILAS BELZ ↗
- Who funds KMHB ↗
- Who funds MAISON BELZ MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds CONGR. BELZ ↗
- Who funds TZOHAR ↗
- Who funds BELZ COMMUNITY CTR ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS AHAVAS CHESED ↗
- Who funds RAV CHESED ↗
- Who funds YAM HATALMOUD ↗
- Who funds CHASDEI SHLOMO ↗
- Who funds BONEI OLAM ↗
- Who funds MCB ↗
- Who funds C.F OF MOSDOS CHASIDEI BELZ ↗
- Who funds KEHAL YETEV LEV SATMAR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Menucha Vesimcha · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire Belz · Congrégation Belz · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.