Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Bnot Jerusalem Kindergarten and Girls' School Bnot Jérusalem Garderie Et École Pour Jeunes Filles

1.

C$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$29k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$22k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$49k
C$2,120
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB)C$29,000
L'INSTITUTION KUPAT TORAH VECHIESEDC$10,400
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$10,000
KEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZC$5,621
CONGREGATION T.Y.Y.C$5,000
VMMC$5,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSOOS CHASIDEI BELZC$2,120
CONGREGATION BELZC$1,500
BELZ COMMUNITY CENTERC$1,000
CONGREGATION ZICHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZC$600
CENTRE JUIF MAZAL DU QUEBEC/JEWISH MAZAL CENTER OF QUEBECC$500
RAV CHESEDC$360
KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.5M · 17 repeat orgsC$99k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

C$1.5M
C$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+35%

Still filing today

88%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BJ
    BNOTH JERUSALEM SEMINARY
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$549k · revenue +17% · 41% of their budget
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZ
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$381k · revenue +83%
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVAS ACHIM
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$103k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • IC
    IMRAY CHAIMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue +35%
  • TL
    TIKVAH LCHAIM TZOHAR
    one grant, 2022 · C$24k · revenue +39%
  • CC
    CHESSED CHAIN
    one grant, 2019 · C$15k · revenue -100% · 99% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
4
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
5
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
6
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
7
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
8
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
9
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
10
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
11
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
12
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Chessed Chain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBNOTH JERUSALEM SEMINARY — C$549,406 over 3y, 41% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$381,194 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetCONGREGATION SHEVAS ACHIM — C$102,906 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetKEHLLAS BELZ — C$84,736 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) — C$83,938 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMERKAZ HACHINUCH — C$69,915 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCONGREGATION T.Y.Y. — C$41,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$32,938 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRav Chesed — C$30,619 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM — C$25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHESSED CHAIN — C$14,500 over 1y, 99% of budgetKOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ UMACHZIKE HADASZ — C$11,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetL'INSTITUTION KUPAT TORAH VECHIESED — C$10,400 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACADEMIE YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE DE MONTREAL — C$8,618 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ — C$5,621 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY CENTER — C$4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetL'ECOLE BETH TZIPORAH — C$2,980 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$2,411 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSOOS CHASIDEI BELZ — C$2,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION B'NAI LEVY — C$2,107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION ZICHRON YAKOV YITZCHOK BELZ — C$1,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE JUIF MAZAL DU QUEBEC/JEWISH MAZAL CENTER OF QUEBEC — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Congrégation BelzCharité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Menucha VesimchaRosenberg Family Foun…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…The M.K. Foundation/L…Kolel of Congregation…Jewish Community Foun…The George Kohn Chari…Fondation de la Famil…
Congrégation BelzQC23× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Congrégation Belz · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Menucha Vesimcha · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · The George Kohn Charitable Foundation / la Fondation Charitable George Kohn · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 106799596:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bnot Jerusalem Kindergarten and Girls' School Bnot Jérusalem Garderie Et École Pour Jeunes Filles’ filings →