Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Agudath Israel of Montreal Inc
The charity conducts youth activities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$12k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YAD EZER | C$26,000 |
| ARIZAL | C$10,932 |
| KOLLEL BELZ | C$7,000 |
| BETH JACOB TEACHERS COLLEGE | C$4,500 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH ON MONTREAL | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BJBETH JACOB TEACHERS SEMINARY6× · 2017–2024 · C$72k · revenue +43%
- JEJEWISH EXPERIENCE3× · 2017–2021 · C$23k · revenue +33%
- AARIZAL3× · 2021–2024 · C$18k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- KBKNESSET BNEI HAGOLAone grant, 2018 · C$16k · revenue -77%
- CCC.C.I. - CANADIAN COUCIL FOR ISRAELone grant, 2017 · C$4k · revenue +5%
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FDTN.graduatedone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
Support of jewish education and institutions
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.
To operate a school for higher talmudic studies
The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.
To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BETH JACOB TEACHERS SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds YAD EZER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds KNESSET BNEI HAGOLA ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION MINCHOS SOLES ↗
- Who funds BETH JACOB SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL BELZ ↗
- Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL ORGN ↗
- Who funds BELZ CONCREGATION ↗
- Who funds C.C.I. - CANADIAN COUCIL FOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FDTN. ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS ↗
- Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH ON MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds MAISON SHALOM ↗
- Who funds BONAI OLAM ↗
- Who funds AUBERGE SHALOM ↗
- Who funds BETH OLOTH ↗
- Who funds BETH TZIPORA ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Maharam Tav Fund · The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial Fund · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Vinegar Family Foundation · Fondation Famille Neuhaus Neuhaus Family Foundation · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.