Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Mississippi · Nonprofit

ZOE MINISTRIES

ZOE MINISTRIES (Mississippi) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $555,463 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($516,300). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 93% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$326k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$555k
Grants received
$540k
Net assets
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 52%

Against its field

ZOE MINISTRIES is better cushioned than half of the 12,796 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−36% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)15% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,796 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($121k) Expenses 100 ($28k) Net assets 100 ($93k)2018 Revenue 211 ($255k) Expenses 577 ($160k) Net assets 202 ($188k)2019 Revenue 249 ($301k) Expenses 546 ($151k) Net assets 382 ($356k)2020 Revenue 204 ($246k) Expenses 612 ($169k) Net assets 465 ($433k)2021 Revenue 383 ($462k) Expenses 1413 ($391k) Net assets 542 ($504k)2022 Revenue 362 ($437k) Expenses 1521 ($421k) Net assets 559 ($521k)2023 Revenue 363 ($439k) Expenses 1445 ($400k) Net assets 601 ($560k)2024 Revenue 270 ($326k) Expenses 1604 ($444k) Net assets 581 ($540k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (270)Expenses (1604)Net assets (581)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

67% of ZOE MINISTRIES’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,235 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$93k
17
$95k
18
$150k
19
$77k
20
$71k
21
$16k
22
$39k
23
$118k
24
5.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income fell $65k → $29k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)93% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ZOE MINISTRIES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ZOE MINISTRIES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 93% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

93% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ZOE MINISTRIES.

93%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 78% · 2022 84% · 2023 68%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

93% of ZOE MINISTRIES's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $39k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Mississippi, across 3 states.

IL
GA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
Mississippi out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $517k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ZOE MINISTRIES

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Mississippi

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

64% of spending goes to programs.

Program 64%Management 22%Fundraising 14%

Governance

5
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MS

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ZOE MINISTRIES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ZOE MINISTRIES?
ZOE MINISTRIES (Mississippi) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $555,463 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($516,300). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 93% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ZOE MINISTRIES have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $555,463 in grants to ZOE MINISTRIES, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ZOE MINISTRIES?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $516,300 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ZOE MINISTRIES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Mississippi. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing