Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

Xpansion Ministries

Xpansion Ministries (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,000 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($35,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$80k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$45k
Net assets
$51k
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%
01What it does

What Xpansion Ministries does

Mission

Church planting and leadership training.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Church Planter Development and Coaching - Xpansion works to support the development of new churches across the United States and internationally by identifying, assessing, training, and coaching church planters. The organization provides guidance throughout the early stages of church planting including leadership development, ministry planning, and launch preparation. In 2025, Xpansion worked with approximately 30 church planters in various stages of starting new churches.

    $28,392 spent
    50% of program spending
  2. Church Planting Network Development - Xpansion also works with leaders in various cities who are seeking to develop collaborative networks that support church planting and ministry partnerships. This includes coaching and advising city leaders on strategies for collaboration, leadership development, and sustainable models for starting new churches. These efforts help strengthen the ecosystem needed to support church planting efforts in multiple regions.

    $17,035 spent
    30% of program spending
  3. Regional Church Planting Initiatives - Xpansion provides targeted support to church planting efforts in specific regions where the organization is actively engaged. In 2025, the primary areas of focus were South Carolina and Texas, where Xpansion assisted with recruiting prospective planters, conducting assessments, providing training opportunities, and offering ongoing coaching to leaders launching new churches.

    $11,356 spent
    20% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $56,783.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($223k) Expenses 100 ($115k) Net assets 100 ($144k)2018 Revenue 39 ($88k) Expenses 139 ($160k) Net assets 50 ($71k)2019 Revenue 42 ($95k) Expenses 110 ($127k) Net assets 27 ($39k)2020 Revenue 30 ($67k) Expenses 78 ($90k) Net assets 11 ($16k)2021 Revenue 52 ($116k) Expenses 58 ($67k) Net assets 45 ($65k)2022 Revenue 24 ($53k) Expenses 62 ($72k) Net assets 32 ($46k)2023 Revenue 31 ($70k) Expenses 53 ($61k) Net assets 38 ($54k)2024 Revenue 35 ($77k) Expenses 86 ($99k) Net assets 23 ($32k)2025 Revenue 36 ($80k) Expenses 53 ($61k) Net assets 36 ($51k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (36)Expenses (53)Net assets (36)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $144k to $72k (−50%).

$144k
$72k
$39k
$41k
$65k
$46k
$54k
$37k
$52k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Xpansion Ministries’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,623 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$108k
’17
−$72k
’18
−$32k
’19
−$23k
’20
$49k
’21
−$19k
’22
$8k
’23
−$22k
’24
$19k
’25
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed444444333
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00000100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2018: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $35k → $10k.

2 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Xpansion Ministries’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Xpansion Ministries leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Xpansion Ministries.

78%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Xpansion Ministries's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $45k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Xpansion Ministries runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,869 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin24% · top quartile
Months of reserve10.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−12% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,869 religion nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like Xpansion Ministries

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 7%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
33%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

72%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Xpansion Ministries: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Xpansion Ministries?
Xpansion Ministries (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,000 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($35,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Xpansion Ministries have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $45,000 in grants to Xpansion Ministries, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Xpansion Ministries?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $35,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Xpansion Ministries find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Xpansion Ministries →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing