Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

New York · Nonprofit

Wright-Ingraham Institute

Wright-Ingraham Institute (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $109,016 to it, the largest being GALE FAMILY FOUNDATION ($105,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$379k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$109k
Grants received
$35k
Net assets
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 12%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($7k) Expenses 100 ($105k) Net assets 100 ($57k)2020 Revenue 2321 ($167k) Expenses 143 ($150k) Net assets 130 ($73k)2021 Revenue 2552 ($183k) Expenses 75 ($78k) Net assets 315 ($178k)2022 Revenue 2652 ($191k) Expenses 264 ($276k) Net assets 153 ($87k)2024 Revenue 2051 ($147k) Expenses 231 ($242k) Net assets 13 ($8k)2025 Revenue 5272 ($379k) Expenses 336 ($352k) Net assets 61 ($35k)
201920202021202220242025
Revenue (5272)Expenses (336)Net assets (61)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2025 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$97k
19
$17k
20
$105k
21
$86k
22
$94k
24
$27k
25
1.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $1k → $20k.

Funder
'18
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
2
2
2
1
2

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.1M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Thomas L Parker Charitable Trust CO Catherine Ingraham). These are real filings, and they are not money Wright-Ingraham Institute raised.

From the IRS filings of Wright-Ingraham Institute’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Wright-Ingraham Institute leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

96%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2021 91% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Wright-Ingraham Institute draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside New York, across 2 states in all.

MN
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
21
22
23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Wright-Ingraham Institute receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $20k on record.

Federal$20k
grants $20kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$20k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Wright-Ingraham Institute

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 17%Fundraising 7%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Thomas L Parker Charitable Trust · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Wright-Ingraham Institute: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Wright-Ingraham Institute?
Wright-Ingraham Institute (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $109,016 to it, the largest being GALE FAMILY FOUNDATION ($105,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Wright-Ingraham Institute have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $109,016 in grants to Wright-Ingraham Institute, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Wright-Ingraham Institute?
GALE FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $105,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Wright-Ingraham Institute find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing