Skip to content

Indiana · Nonprofit

WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT (Indiana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $43,741 to it, the largest being STEUBEN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($43,641). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$36k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$44k
Net assets
$461k
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What Wood-Land-Lakes Resource Conservation & Development does

Mission

Education and leadership for wise use of natural resources including conservation easements.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. We assist, monitor and help implement conservation easements to farmers in the state of indiana. We also distribute educational and helpful information through newsletters and press releases to the area media to inform the public of the opportunities with conservation easements in economic and environmental areas in northeast indiana. Donated conservation easements show no value, as the conservation property was accepted solely to be saved for its potential future, and has no alternative use.

    $44,578 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. We assist, monitor and help implement conservation easements to farmers in the state of indiana. We also distribute educational and helpful information through newsletters and press releases to the area media to inform the public of the opportunities with conservation easements in the economic and environmental areas in northeast indiana. Donated conservation easements show no value, as the conservation property was accepted solely to be saved for its potential future, and has no alternative use.

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $44,578.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($31k) Expenses 100 ($20k) Net assets 100 ($1.6M)2018 Revenue 17 ($5k) Expenses 37 ($7k) Net assets 100 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 136 ($42k) Expenses 27 ($5k) Net assets 102 ($1.6M)2020 Revenue 58 ($18k) Expenses 21 ($4k) Net assets 28 ($442k)2021 Revenue 137 ($43k) Expenses 62 ($12k) Net assets 30 ($468k)2022 Revenue 81 ($25k) Expenses 144 ($28k) Net assets 27 ($428k)2023 Revenue 94 ($29k) Expenses 277 ($55k) Net assets 28 ($435k)2024 Revenue 114 ($36k) Expenses 227 ($45k) Net assets 29 ($461k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (114)Expenses (227)Net assets (29)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $1.6M to $442k (−73%).

$1.6M
$1.6M
$1.6M
$442k
$468k
$428k
$435k
$461k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (92% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,989 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$11k
’17
−$2k
’18
$37k
’19
$14k
’20
$30k
’21
−$3k
’22
−$25k
’23
−$9k
’24
5.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed99101010998
Joined·+0+1+0+0+1+0+1
No longer listed·0000202
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $8k → $6k.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
2
2
2
1
1

2 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT.

100%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $44k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT has grown faster than half of the 3,152 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−25% · below the median
Months of reserve5.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,152 environment nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Indiana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT?
WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT (Indiana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $43,741 to it, the largest being STEUBEN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($43,641). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $43,741 in grants to WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT?
STEUBEN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $43,641 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOOD-LAND-LAKES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Indiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Wood-Land-Lakes Resource Conservation & Development →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing