Skip to content

Hawaii · Nonprofit

WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN

WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN (Hawaii) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $970,011 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($949,771). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$625k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$970k
Net assets
$548k
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 56%
01What it does

What Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture & Natural Resource Man does

Mission

To advance women's empowerment and gender equality to tackle climate change, food insecurity and poverty within enabling environments. WOCAN strengthens capacities of organizations and individuals for gender integration and leadership. It owns and maintains the W+ Standard to measure, quantify, certify and monetize women's empowerment benefits within projects, generating revenue for women's groups and organizations.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. W+ Standard and Technical Assistance: The W+ Advisory Council reviewed and approved three companies as accredited W+ verifiying bodies, based on guidance developed in 2024 for Verifying Bodies. Three meetings were held with the W+ Advisory Council. WOCAN provided technical assistance to projects applying the W+ Standard in Cambodia, Ghana, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands. Expenses were for consultants' fees and travel to project sites, registration and verification by a third party auditor.

    $217,561 spentof which $584,148 as grants$391,555 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  2. Capacity Building/Training: WOCAN provided hands-on training in the W+ Standard to 4 people as W+ Apprentices, three of which have now become W+ Experts. Two of these are women from the Asia/Pacific region, in India and New Zealand and one is a man from Mexico. All of the W+ Experts from the US, Mexico, India, Nepal, New Zealand, Madagascar and Cambodia met in Bangkok for a one week skill building session and to build a stronger network for their internal sharing of experiences.

    $47,097 spentof which $9,900 as grants$-32,170 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  3. Research: WOCAN prepared the TOR, interviewed 6 firms and selected a consultancy firm (Social Finance International) to conduct a market analysis of the W+ Market and an organizational analysis of WOCAN's capacities, to generate a roadmap for scaling the W+ Standard, as requested by the Gates Foundation. The work was conducted by a consortium that included the Cambridge University Institute for Sustainability Leadership, British Asia Trust and Consulting for Sustainable Solutions (South Africa).

    $366,034 spentof which $2,000 as grants$-340,774 earned by the program
    51% of program spending
  4. Outreach and Marketing: WOCAN held various events to share knowledge about the W+ Standard. The W+ Coordinator and ED held meetings with over 42 organizations interested to apply the W+ Standard. WOCAN organized 2 events at NY Climate Week, and 3 at the COP30 in Brazil. Staff participated in several webinars as speakers on gender and climate. This program includes fees of marketing consultant and Knowledge Management staff to prepare materials, update and maintain 2 websites, and share news with social media and monthly digests, blog posts and podcasts. In addition, this year a communications and marketing team in NYC was hired to develop marketing materials and hire a press consultant that resulted in coverage by CNN and others. The W+ website was re-designed as an e-commerce site to sell W+ credits from selected projects.

    $86,891 spentof which $29,990 as grants$-73,290 earned by the program
    12% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $717,583.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($248k) Expenses 100 ($228k) Net assets 100 ($59k)2020 Revenue 62 ($154k) Expenses 85 ($193k) Net assets 34 ($20k)2021 Revenue 147 ($365k) Expenses 78 ($178k) Net assets 352 ($206k)2022 Revenue 324 ($802k) Expenses 126 ($287k) Net assets 1196 ($702k)2023 Revenue 58 ($143k) Expenses 176 ($401k) Net assets 755 ($444k)2024 Revenue 225 ($557k) Expenses 143 ($326k) Net assets 1046 ($614k)2025 Revenue 252 ($625k) Expenses 391 ($891k) Net assets 932 ($548k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (252)Expenses (391)Net assets (932)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $206k to $702k (+240%).

$59k
$20k
$206k
$702k
$444k
$614k
$548k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

57% of WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,373 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$20k
’19
−$39k
’20
$187k
’21
$515k
’22
−$259k
’23
$231k
’24
−$267k
’25
1.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jeannette Gurung

Executive Director

Board chair

Tanushree Bagh

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

201920212022202320242025
Listed555434
Joined··+3+1+0+3
No longer listed··3212
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $20k → $50.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
2
1
2
1
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

98%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Hawaii, across 2 states in all.

WA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’22
Hawaii out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $240 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN has grown faster than half of the 1,936 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−43% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)17% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,936 food & nutrition nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Hawaii

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 8%Fundraising 11%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

NY
HI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN?
WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN (Hawaii) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $970,011 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($949,771). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $970,011 in grants to WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN?
GATES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $949,771 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOMEN ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE IN AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE MAN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Hawaii. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture & Natural Resource Man →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing