North Dakota · Nonprofit
WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY
WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY (North Dakota) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $670,003 to it, the largest being THE BUSH FOUNDATION ($653,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 11,754 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,754 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Dakota Medical Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio match
- Women's Foundation of Minnesotashared fundersportfolio match
- United Way of Cass-Clayshared funderslocal
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 63% · 2018 70% · 2019 76% · 2020 79% · 2021 82% · 2022 82% · 2023 69% · 2024 52% · 2025 47%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
83% of WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $144k → $170k.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 94% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside North Dakota, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Dakota Medical Charitiesshared funderslocalportfolio matchND · backs 26 organizations that share your funders · funds 46 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Women's Foundation of Minnesotashared fundersportfolio matchMN · backs 31 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Cass-Clayshared funderslocalND · backs 33 organizations that share your funders · funds 44 organizations near you
- Anderson Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Northwest North Dakota Community Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Wbd Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Herman Robert E Charitable Tr Mainportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Womadix Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Border States Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Minnesota Chamber Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- John T Vucurevich Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dakota Medical Foundationshared funderslocalND · backs 55 organizations that share your funders · funds 96 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $3.5M on record.
- Small Business Administration$3.5M
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In North Dakota
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
86% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY?
- WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY (North Dakota) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $670,003 to it, the largest being THE BUSH FOUNDATION ($653,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $670,003 in grants to WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY?
- THE BUSH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $653,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing