Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being Rippleworks Inc ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$23k
Revenue FY2024
3
Funders on record
$60k
Grants received
$112k
Net assets
0/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 69%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4k) Expenses 100 ($2k) Net assets -123 ($-34250)2018 Revenue 469 ($19k) Expenses 1186 ($18k) Net assets -120 ($-33203)2019 Revenue 2 ($80) Expenses 393 ($6k) Net assets -141 ($-39078)2020 Revenue 2152 ($87k) Expenses 4362 ($66k) Net assets -63 ($-17368)2021 Revenue 1345 ($55k) Expenses 625 ($9k) Net assets 100 ($28k)2022 Revenue 1359 ($55k) Expenses 737 ($11k) Net assets 258 ($72k)2023 Revenue 905 ($37k) Expenses 643 ($10k) Net assets 356 ($99k)2024 Revenue 554 ($23k) Expenses 611 ($9k) Net assets 403 ($112k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (554)Expenses (611)Net assets (403)
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'20
total
$20k
funders
3

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)25% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

58% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION.

42%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $15k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION?
WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being Rippleworks Inc ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $60,000 in grants to WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION.
Who is the largest funder of WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION?
Rippleworks Inc is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WLADYSLAW PONIECKI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing