Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
WASHINGTON WOMEN IN PUBLIC RELATIONS (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 1 grantmaker whose IRS filings report $45,000 in grants to it, the largest being AARP ($45,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
WASHINGTON WOMEN IN PUBLIC RELATIONS has grown faster than three-quarters of the 8,864 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,864 community improvement nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
$15k from 1 funders in 2023, up from $30k and 1 in 2022.
From the IRS filings of WASHINGTON WOMEN IN PUBLIC RELATIONS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
WASHINGTON WOMEN IN PUBLIC RELATIONS is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing