Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC

WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $75,000 to it, the largest being PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA ($25,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$884k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$75k
Grants received
$248k
Net assets
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%

Against its field

WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC is better cushioned than half of the 1,796 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−14% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve9.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−8% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,796 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($312k)2018 Revenue 84 ($1.3M) Expenses 91 ($1.6M) Net assets 24 ($74k)2019 Revenue 91 ($1.5M) Expenses 76 ($1.3M) Net assets 70 ($218k)2020 Revenue 48 ($759k) Expenses 51 ($883k) Net assets 30 ($93k)2021 Revenue 41 ($650k) Expenses 38 ($652k) Net assets 29 ($91k)2022 Revenue 83 ($1.3M) Expenses 52 ($897k) Net assets 165 ($516k)2023 Revenue 52 ($833k) Expenses 52 ($893k) Net assets 113 ($353k)2024 Revenue 55 ($884k) Expenses 59 ($1.0M) Net assets 79 ($248k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (55)Expenses (59)Net assets (79)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 1% · 2020 1% · 2021 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

18% of WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,977 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$132k
17
$238k
18
$143k
19
$124k
20
$2k
21
$425k
22
$60k
23
$127k
24
9.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $10k → $35k.

From the IRS filings of WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC.

33%
largest funder
73%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2023 71%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

60% of WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.

VA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
19
23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 21%Fundraising 2%

Governance

11
board members
91%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

DC

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Wipp Education Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC?
WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $75,000 to it, the largest being PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA ($25,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $75,000 in grants to WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC?
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WOMEN IMPACTING PUBLIC POLICY INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing