Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS (Washington) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $72,790 to it, the largest being National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($41,600). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$596k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$73k
Net assets
$54k
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Washington Association of Child Advocate Programs does

Mission

Support member casa/gal programs providing trained volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children in the court system.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Americorps

    $304,144 spent
    50% of program spending
  2. Technical assistance - provides technical assistance and training to local casa programs.

    $265,134 spent
    44% of program spending
  3. Public awareness - performed activities in an attempt to change public policy to better care for the abused and neglected children involved in the court system.

    $21,317 spent
    4% of program spending
  4. Partnerships & coalitions - representing washington state casa in statewide advisory committees and coalitions to improve policies and practices and practices impacting children in foster care; and coordination and joint planning with statewide agencies and organizations related to the courts and child welfare system.

    $6,676 spent
    1% of program spending
  5. Annual conference - annual state conference to provide training and networking opportunities for casa volunteers and program staff. Legal professionals also attend to earn cpe credits.

    $5,505 spent
    1% of program spending
  6. Other Programs

The 6 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $602,776.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($331k) Expenses 100 ($364k) Net assets 100 ($160k)2018 Revenue 91 ($301k) Expenses 88 ($321k) Net assets 88 ($140k)2019 Revenue 73 ($240k) Expenses 76 ($278k) Net assets 64 ($102k)2020 Revenue 50 ($166k) Expenses 49 ($180k) Net assets 55 ($89k)2021 Revenue 82 ($272k) Expenses 59 ($216k) Net assets 91 ($145k)2022 Revenue 100 ($332k) Expenses 100 ($362k) Net assets 72 ($114k)2023 Revenue 218 ($722k) Expenses 204 ($742k) Net assets 59 ($94k)2024 Revenue 248 ($822k) Expenses 230 ($837k) Net assets 50 ($79k)2025 Revenue 180 ($596k) Expenses 171 ($621k) Net assets 34 ($54k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (180)Expenses (171)Net assets (34)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $156k to $108k (−30%).

$188k
$164k
$122k
$129k
$164k
$149k
$156k
$108k
$74k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,975 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$33k
’17
−$20k
’18
−$38k
’19
−$14k
’20
$56k
’21
−$30k
’22
−$20k
’23
−$15k
’24
−$25k
’25
1.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Ryan Murrey

Exec. Director

Board chair

Cynthia Whipple

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1213131414131214
Joined·+4+0·+0+1+2+4
No longer listed·30·0232
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $42k → $130.

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS.

57%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 98% · 2021 97% · 2022 97% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS's revenue grew 80% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve1.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 904 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS?
WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS (Washington) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $72,790 to it, the largest being National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($41,600). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $72,790 in grants to WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS?
National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association is the largest funder on record, with $41,600 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Washington Association of Child Advocate Programs →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing