Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS (Washington) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $72,790 to it, the largest being National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($41,600). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$596k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$73k
Grants received
$54k
Net assets
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%

Against its field

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS's revenue grew 80% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve1.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 814 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($331k) Expenses 100 ($364k) Net assets 100 ($160k)2018 Revenue 91 ($301k) Expenses 88 ($321k) Net assets 88 ($140k)2019 Revenue 73 ($240k) Expenses 76 ($278k) Net assets 64 ($102k)2020 Revenue 50 ($166k) Expenses 49 ($180k) Net assets 55 ($89k)2021 Revenue 82 ($272k) Expenses 59 ($216k) Net assets 91 ($145k)2022 Revenue 100 ($332k) Expenses 100 ($362k) Net assets 72 ($114k)2023 Revenue 218 ($722k) Expenses 204 ($742k) Net assets 59 ($94k)2024 Revenue 248 ($822k) Expenses 230 ($837k) Net assets 50 ($79k)2025 Revenue 180 ($596k) Expenses 171 ($621k) Net assets 34 ($54k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (180)Expenses (171)Net assets (34)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,977 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$33k
17
$20k
18
$38k
19
$14k
20
$56k
21
$30k
22
$20k
23
$15k
24
$25k
25
1.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $42k → $130.

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS.

57%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 98% · 2021 97% · 2022 97% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS?
WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS (Washington) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $72,790 to it, the largest being National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ($41,600). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $72,790 in grants to WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS?
National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association is the largest funder on record, with $41,600 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ADVOCATE PROGRAMS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing