Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
Warren and Forest Counties EOC
Warren and Forest Counties EOC (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $174,372 to it, the largest being Greater Erie Community Action Committee ($122,372). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Warren and Forest Counties EOC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,812 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,812 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- United Fund of Warren County Incshared funderslocalportfolio match
- United Way of Erie Countyshared fundersportfolio match
- Betts Foundationshared funderslocalportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 93% · 2018 86% · 2019 89% · 2020 90% · 2021 86% · 2022 86% · 2023 89% · 2024 85% · 2025 82%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
84% of Warren and Forest Counties EOC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (61% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 30% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Warren and Forest Counties EOC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Warren and Forest Counties EOC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Warren and Forest Counties EOC.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of Warren and Forest Counties EOC's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $52k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- United Fund of Warren County Incshared funderslocalportfolio matchPA · backs 15 organizations that share your funders · funds 20 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Erie Countyshared fundersportfolio matchPA · backs 13 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Betts Foundationshared funderslocalportfolio matchPA · backs 19 organizations that share your funders · funds 28 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Erie Community Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchPA · backs 23 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Hoyt Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Community Foundation of Greater Johnstownportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Community Foundation of the Northern Allegheniesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arthur W Phillips Trust Uwportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Warren County Ohioportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Regis Synan Family Foundation LLCportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Richard T Betts Family Foundationshared funderslocalPA · backs 10 organizations that share your funders · funds 11 organizations near you
- The Leofsky Foundation InclocalPA · funds 9 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Warren and Forest Counties EOC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
92% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
95%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Warren and Forest Counties EOC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Warren and Forest Counties EOC?
- Warren and Forest Counties EOC (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $174,372 to it, the largest being Greater Erie Community Action Committee ($122,372). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Warren and Forest Counties EOC have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $174,372 in grants to Warren and Forest Counties EOC.
- Who is the largest funder of Warren and Forest Counties EOC?
- Greater Erie Community Action Committee is the largest funder on record, with $122,372 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Warren and Forest Counties EOC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing