Missouri · Nonprofit
Veterans Court Technology Clinic In
Veterans Court Technology Clinic In (Missouri) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $37 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($37). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
Veterans Court Technology Clinic In receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $37 to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,572 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2019
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commissionlocal
- Disabled American Veterans California Rehabilitation Foundationportfolio match
- Combat Veterans Motorcycle Associationportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $5 → $16.
1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Veterans Court Technology Clinic In’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of Veterans Court Technology Clinic In's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $37 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development CommissionlocalMO · funds 156 organizations near you
- Disabled American Veterans California Rehabilitation Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Combat Veterans Motorcycle Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Bowlers to Veterans Linkportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Vetsaid Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Warrior Initiative Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Patriot Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Veterans Support Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pennsylvania Veterans Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Phil and Lisa Williams Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Open Stewardship Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Disabled American Veterans Department of Minnesota Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Veterans Court Technology Clinic In
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Missouri
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Veterans Court Technology Clinic In: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Veterans Court Technology Clinic In?
- Veterans Court Technology Clinic In (Missouri) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $37 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($37). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does Veterans Court Technology Clinic In have?
- IRS filings report 1 organization giving $37 in grants to Veterans Court Technology Clinic In, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Veterans Court Technology Clinic In?
- AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $37 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Veterans Court Technology Clinic In find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2019–2019), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing