Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER

US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER (Michigan) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $165,506 to it, the largest being THE KRESGE FOUNDATION ($150,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$729k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$166k
Grants received
$895k
Net assets
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 42%

Against its field

US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · below the median
Months of reserve15.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($250k) Expenses 100 ($191k) Net assets 100 ($363k)2018 Revenue 184 ($461k) Expenses 201 ($383k) Net assets 122 ($442k)2019 Revenue 193 ($484k) Expenses 211 ($402k) Net assets 144 ($524k)2020 Revenue 164 ($410k) Expenses 207 ($395k) Net assets 148 ($539k)2021 Revenue 237 ($593k) Expenses 185 ($354k) Net assets 214 ($779k)2022 Revenue 259 ($648k) Expenses 283 ($540k) Net assets 244 ($887k)2023 Revenue 231 ($578k) Expenses 341 ($651k) Net assets 224 ($814k)2024 Revenue 231 ($578k) Expenses 249 ($475k) Net assets 252 ($916k)2025 Revenue 291 ($729k) Expenses 393 ($750k) Net assets 246 ($895k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (291)Expenses (393)Net assets (246)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

43% of US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$60k
17
$78k
18
$82k
19
$16k
20
$240k
21
$108k
22
$73k
23
$102k
24
$21k
25
16
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $61k → $9k.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
2
3
2
2
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

91%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 0% · 2021 60% · 2022 0% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

91% of US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI
HI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $106 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 20%Fundraising 13%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER?
US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER (Michigan) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $165,506 to it, the largest being THE KRESGE FOUNDATION ($150,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $165,506 in grants to US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER?
THE KRESGE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $150,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL WEST MICHIGAN CHAPTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing