Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

South Carolina · Nonprofit

The Watering Hole Poetry Organization

The Watering Hole Poetry Organization (South Carolina) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $121,650 to it, the largest being The Poetry Foundation ($50,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$289k
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$122k
Grants received
$211k
Net assets
2/4 repeat funders

Against its field

The Watering Hole Poetry Organization runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin53% · top quartile
Months of reserve6.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)23% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($56k) Expenses 100 ($39k) Net assets 100 ($17k)2018 Revenue 75 ($42k) Expenses 91 ($36k) Net assets 140 ($24k)2019 Revenue 63 ($35k) Expenses 75 ($29k) Net assets 174 ($30k)2020 Revenue 114 ($64k) Expenses 74 ($29k) Net assets 379 ($65k)2021 Revenue 78 ($44k) Expenses 74 ($29k) Net assets 341 ($59k)2022 Revenue 77 ($44k) Expenses 41 ($16k) Net assets 500 ($86k)2024 Revenue 175 ($98k) Expenses 258 ($101k) Net assets 343 ($59k)2025 Revenue 512 ($289k) Expenses 351 ($137k) Net assets 1220 ($211k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'24'25
Revenue (512)Expenses (351)Net assets (1220)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 46% · 2025 25%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of The Watering Hole Poetry Organization’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
17
$7k
18
$6k
19
$35k
20
$15k
21
$28k
22
$2k
24
$152k
25
6.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
2
2

From the IRS filings of The Watering Hole Poetry Organization’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

The Watering Hole Poetry Organization leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund The Watering Hole Poetry Organization.

41%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

The Watering Hole Poetry Organization draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside South Carolina, across 4 states in all.

IL
NY
NV
GA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding The Watering Hole Poetry Organization receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $75k on record.

Federal$75k
grants $75kcontracts $0
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$75k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like The Watering Hole Poetry Organization

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 29%Fundraising 9%

Governance

7
board members
86%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

SC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for The Watering Hole Poetry Organization: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds The Watering Hole Poetry Organization?
The Watering Hole Poetry Organization (South Carolina) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $121,650 to it, the largest being The Poetry Foundation ($50,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does The Watering Hole Poetry Organization have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $121,650 in grants to The Watering Hole Poetry Organization, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of The Watering Hole Poetry Organization?
The Poetry Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like The Watering Hole Poetry Organization find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing