Loading…
Loading…
Wisconsin · Nonprofit
THE GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA (Wisconsin) is funded by 11 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $238,015 in grants to it, the largest being THE JOURIS FAMILY FOUNDATION ($87,200). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,751 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,751 philanthropy nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 5 as grant income moved $25k → $36k.
From the IRS filings of THE GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
THE GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 37% of grant income and the top three 74%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 50% · 2019 60% · 2020 69% · 2021 38% · 2022 50% · 2023 57% · 2024 62% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
29% of THE GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA draws 50% of its grant income from funders outside Wisconsin — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 11 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 11funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing