Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

THE ARC MUSKEGON

THE ARC MUSKEGON (Michigan) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $515,752 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY ($275,801). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$574k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$516k
Grants received
$1.1M
Net assets
4/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 56%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($163k) Expenses 100 ($147k) Net assets 100 ($252k)2018 Revenue 124 ($203k) Expenses 145 ($213k) Net assets 96 ($242k)2019 Revenue 166 ($270k) Expenses 160 ($234k) Net assets 110 ($278k)2020 Revenue 131 ($214k) Expenses 146 ($214k) Net assets 110 ($278k)2021 Revenue 180 ($294k) Expenses 157 ($231k) Net assets 136 ($341k)2022 Revenue 515 ($842k) Expenses 199 ($292k) Net assets 354 ($891k)2023 Revenue 308 ($503k) Expenses 234 ($343k) Net assets 417 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 351 ($574k) Expenses 338 ($495k) Net assets 449 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (351)Expenses (338)Net assets (449)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
17
$10k
18
$36k
19
$135
20
$63k
21
$550k
22
$159k
23
$79k
24
6.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $16k → $89k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
3
1

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)57% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE ARC MUSKEGON’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE ARC MUSKEGON leans on a few funders — its largest provides 53% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE ARC MUSKEGON.

53%
largest funder
97%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 71% · 2019 67% · 2020 85% · 2021 49% · 2022 37% · 2023 59%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

57% of THE ARC MUSKEGON's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $224k that is directly attributable, 61% of it comes from Michigan funders.

MI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $291k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like THE ARC MUSKEGON

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 17%Fundraising 21%

Governance

52
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

49%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE ARC MUSKEGON: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE ARC MUSKEGON?
THE ARC MUSKEGON (Michigan) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $515,752 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY ($275,801). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE ARC MUSKEGON have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $515,752 in grants to THE ARC MUSKEGON, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE ARC MUSKEGON?
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $275,801 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE ARC MUSKEGON find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing