Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

THE ARC MUSKEGON

THE ARC MUSKEGON (Michigan) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $525,752 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY ($275,801). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$484k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$526k
Net assets
$1.1M
5/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 56%
01What it does

What The Arc Muskegon does

Mission

The arc of muskegon's mission is to provide advocacy, education, and support services to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families and actively support their inclusion, equality, and participation in the community.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Whisker room

    $155,099 spent$39,441 earned by the program
    39% of program spending
  2. Advocacy - provides information and referrals, parental support, public policy, educational seminars, and community outreach to families and individuals with cognitive and developmental disabilities.

    $116,540 spent$85,597 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  3. Consumer voice - participants of this program serve on various performance improvement committees and work groups, and participate in on-going training activities that promote self advocacy.

    $76,675 spent$20,396 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  4. Representative payee and trust services - a representative payee manages benefits by paying living expenses from ssi, ssdi, or social security income. Bills are paid through a mutually agreed upon budget.

    $44,530 spent$69,860 earned by the program
    11% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $392,844.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($163k) Expenses 100 ($147k) Net assets 100 ($252k)2018 Revenue 124 ($203k) Expenses 145 ($213k) Net assets 96 ($242k)2019 Revenue 166 ($270k) Expenses 160 ($234k) Net assets 110 ($278k)2020 Revenue 131 ($214k) Expenses 146 ($214k) Net assets 110 ($278k)2021 Revenue 180 ($294k) Expenses 157 ($231k) Net assets 136 ($341k)2022 Revenue 515 ($842k) Expenses 199 ($292k) Net assets 354 ($891k)2023 Revenue 308 ($503k) Expenses 234 ($343k) Net assets 417 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 351 ($574k) Expenses 338 ($495k) Net assets 449 ($1.1M)2025 Revenue 296 ($484k) Expenses 382 ($561k) Net assets 418 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (296)Expenses (382)Net assets (418)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $685k to $1.2M (+80%).

$280k
$341k
$403k
$497k
$685k
$1.2M
$1.5M
$1.4M
$1.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2025 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
’17
−$10k
’18
$36k
’19
−$135
’20
$63k
’21
$550k
’22
$159k
’23
$79k
’24
−$76k
’25
6.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed9108888101111
Joined·+1+1+0+0+0+8+3+2
No longer listed·03000622
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $16k → $89k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
'26*
total
funders
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
3
2
1

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 55% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE ARC MUSKEGON’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE ARC MUSKEGON leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE ARC MUSKEGON.

52%
largest funder
97%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 71% · 2019 67% · 2020 85% · 2021 49% · 2022 37% · 2023 59% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

55% of THE ARC MUSKEGON's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $234k that is directly attributable, 59% of it comes from Michigan funders.

MI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $291k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THE ARC MUSKEGON

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 14%Fundraising 15%

Governance

56
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

42%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE ARC MUSKEGON: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE ARC MUSKEGON?
THE ARC MUSKEGON (Michigan) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $525,752 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY ($275,801). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE ARC MUSKEGON have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $525,752 in grants to THE ARC MUSKEGON, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE ARC MUSKEGON?
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $275,801 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE ARC MUSKEGON find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Arc Muskegon →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing