Texas · Nonprofit
TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Texas) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,427,700 to it, the largest being O'DONNELL FOUNDATION ($2,180,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 5 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,110 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Nash Family Foundationshared funders
- Texas Medical Center Foundationportfolio match
- Raise Your Hand for Texas Education Fundportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 7% · 2021 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
53% of TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $36k → $116k.
3 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 90% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 14% · 2018 83% · 2019 50% · 2021 60% · 2022 99% · 2023 69% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
20% of TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
100% of TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY's grant income comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $178k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Nash Family Foundationshared fundersNY · backs 35 organizations that share your funders
- Texas Medical Center Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Raise Your Hand for Texas Education Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Charles Butt Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- E & M Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bellinger Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Saving Tiny Hearts Societyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Medical Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Halliburton Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Saem Research Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Joyce and Irving Goldman Family Foundation Incshared fundersNY · backs 36 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
76% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
63%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY?
- TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Texas) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,427,700 to it, the largest being O'DONNELL FOUNDATION ($2,180,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY have?
- IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $2,427,700 in grants to TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY?
- O'DONNELL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,180,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TEXAS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 10funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing