Loading…
Loading…
Texas · Nonprofit
TEMPLE LITERACY COUNCIL (Texas) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $13,875 in grants to it, the largest being JOE AND LOUISE COOK FOUNDATION ($7,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TEMPLE LITERACY COUNCIL is better cushioned than half of the 17,614 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,614 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2020
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
105% of TEMPLE LITERACY COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (50% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
$1k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $1k and 1 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of TEMPLE LITERACY COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
TEMPLE LITERACY COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 61% · 2019 63% · 2020 62% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
TEMPLE LITERACY COUNCIL is locally rooted: 65% of its grant income comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2020 (financials across 2019–2020), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing