Wisconsin · Nonprofit
TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC
TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $42,877 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($25,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC has grown faster than half of the 3,857 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,857 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Incshared funders
- Daniel M Soref Rvoc Trshared funders
- Brewers Community Foundation Incshared funders
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
101% of TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $4k → $3k.
2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 75% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 65% · 2020 71% · 2021 99% · 2023 89% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
75% of TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $11k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Wisconsin funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $32k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Incshared fundersWI · backs 42 organizations that share your funders
- Daniel M Soref Rvoc Trshared fundersWI · backs 28 organizations that share your funders
- Brewers Community Foundation Incshared fundersWI · backs 42 organizations that share your funders
- Nicholas Family Foundation Trustshared fundersWI · backs 32 organizations that share your funders
- STACKNER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC co KRISTIN A OCCHETTIshared funderslocalWI · backs 40 organizations that share your funders · funds 36 organizations near you
- Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitableshared fundersWI · backs 41 organizations that share your funders
- Charles D Jacobus Family Foundationshared fundersWI · backs 21 organizations that share your funders
- Charter Manufacturing Company Foundation Incshared fundersWI · backs 24 organizations that share your funders
- Ralph Evinrude Foundation Incshared fundersWI · backs 65 organizations that share your funders
- Anon Charitable Trustshared fundersWI · backs 60 organizations that share your funders
- United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Incshared fundersWI · backs 119 organizations that share your funders
- Weiss Family Foundationshared fundersWI · backs 33 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
99% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
95%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC?
- TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $42,877 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($25,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 75% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $42,877 in grants to TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC?
- MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TEE UP FORE THE CURE INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing