Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
Syracuse Community Center Inc (Ohio) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,125 in grants to it, the largest being Meigs Local Enrichment Foundation Inc ($5,225). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Syracuse Community Center Inc runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 12,803 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,803 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
13% of Syracuse Community Center Inc’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (44% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$900 from 1 funders in 2019, up from $5k and 1 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of Syracuse Community Center Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Syracuse Community Center Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 85% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Syracuse Community Center Inc is locally rooted: 85% of its grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
76% of spending goes to programs.
29%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing