California · Nonprofit
Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation
Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,370 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($10,370). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation's revenue grew 1537% between 2024 and 2025.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,307 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Jason Debus Heigl Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- Marion and Richard Graham Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- Jayzum Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2024, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2024, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (86% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 91% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
91% of Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Jason Debus Heigl Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 4 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Marion and Richard Graham Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchFL · backs 2 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Jayzum Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 2 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Caring Songs for All Creatures Incshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 2 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Max Goldenson Foundation for Modern Dog Adoptionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Booboo Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Girtys Place Animal Rescue and Sanctuaryportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Houston Petsetportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Starfish Animal Rescueportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lucille Atwell Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Crystal Family Foundationshared fundersCA · backs 2 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation?
- Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,370 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($10,370). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $11,370 in grants to Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation.
- Who is the largest funder of Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation?
- Schwab Charitable Fund is the largest funder on record, with $10,370 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Sweet Angel Dog Rescue Corporation find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2024–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing